• Alexander M. Pascua School of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Marinduque State College, Philippines
  • Ma. Lorraine L. Pascua School of Technology, Marinduque State College, Philippines
  • Engelbert K. Peralta University of the Philippines, Philippines
Keywords: Maturity Stage, Deformation, Young Coconut, Creep-Recovery


Information on the damage incidence of young coconut was generated by establishing the threshold values due to compression. Factors influencing damage and deformation under dead load were evaluated. It was found that maturity, time of load application and load significantly affected bruise area and deformation of young coconut. Larger bruise area was noted for 6-7 month old (Mat1) nuts as compared with 7-8 month old (Mat2) nuts. On the contrary, Mat2 had significantly higher deformation than Mat1. It was found that Mat1 nut was firmer and stiffer than Mat2 nuts. Fruits at both maturity levels can only resist 75kilograms dead load at 3 hours loading without significantly causing any detectable damage over the fruit’s surfaces. Generally, increase in the magnitude of bruise area and deformation was associated with the increase in load and time of load application. Correlation analysis revealed that bruise area and deformation were significantly correlated with load. Some positive correlations were also found to exist between bruise and time of loading. Prediction models were developed and validated for compression relating magnitude of bruise and deformation on different parameters in the study.


Download data is not yet available.


American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1988. Compression Test of Food Materials of Convex Shape. ASAE Standards. Pp. 356-359.

Brown, G. K., Schulte-Pason,N. L., Timm, E. J., Burton, C. L. and Marshall, D. E. (1990). Apple Packaging Line Impact Damage Reduction. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 6(6): Pp. 759- 764.

Burton, C. L., Shulte-Pason, N. L., Brown, G. K. and Timm, E. J. (1987). The Effect of Impact Bruising on Apples and Subsequent Decay Development. ASAE Paper No. 87-6516. St. Joseph, MI: ASAE.

Curada, A. B. and Peralta, E. K. (2001). Impact Damage in Papaya Fruits (Carica papaya L.). Philippine Agricultural Mechanization Bulletin Vol. 8(4): Pp. 8-16.

Fridley, R. B. and Adrian, P. A (1966). Mechanical Properties of Peaches, Pears, Apricots, and Apples. Transactions of the ASAE Vol. 9(1): Pp. 135-138.

Garcia, C. and Ruiz, M. (1988). Impact Parameters Related to Bruising in Selected Fruits. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Paper No. 88-6027, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, USA.

Gatchalian, M. M. (1992). Quality Assessment and Development of Young Coconut (Cocos nucifera, L.) from Postharvest through Storage and Processing. A dissertation paper, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan.

Li, Z. (2013). The effect of compressibility, loading position and probe shape on the rupture probability of tomato fruits. Journal ofFood Engineering, 119(3), 471e476. DOI:

Li, Z., Li, P., & Liu, J. (2011a). Effect of mechanical damage on mass loss and water content in tomato fruits. International Agrophysics, 25,77e83.

Li, Z. G., Li, P. P., & Liu, J. Z. (2010). Effect of tomato internal structure on its mechanical properties and degree of mechanical damage. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 1816e1826.

Li, Z., Li, P., & Liu, J. (2011b). Physical and mechanical properties of tomato fruits as related to robot’s harvesting. Journal of Food Engineering, 103, 170e178. DOI:

Li, Z., Li, P., & Yang, H. (2013). Stability tests of grasping tomato with two fingers for harvesting robot. Biosystems Engineering, 2013(116), 163e170. DOI:

Li, Z., Li, P., Yang,H., & Liu, J. (2013). Internal mechanical damage prediction in tomato compression using multiscale finite element models. Journal of Food Engineering, 116, Pg. 639- 647.Retrieved from S0260877413000319 DOI:

Li, Z. and Thomas, C. (2017). Quantitative evaluation of Mechanical Damage to Fresh Fruits. Retrieved from Pg. 39

Mohsenin, N. N. (1980). Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc. Pp. 127-130, 430-434.

Nelson, C. W. (1967). Maximum Allowable Static and Dynamic Loads for Mechanical Injury in McIntosh Apples. M. S. Thesis in Agricultural Engineering. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa.

Pascua, A. M. (2017). Impact Damage Threshold of Young Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). International Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology. Vol. 4(11): Pg. 1-9. Retrieved 30 November 2017 from

Quintos, S. V. (1991). ‘Bukayo’ (Candied Coconut Meat): Improvement of its Quality and Shelf life. Undergraduate thesis. U.P. College of Home Economics Quezon City, Philippines.

Ross, I. J. and Isaacs, G. M. (1961). Capacity of Enclosed Conveyors Handling Granular Materials (Part III). Transactions of the ASAE 4(1): Pp. 97-100, 104.

Shigley and Mitchell (1983). Mechanical Engineering Design. Transactions of the ASAE 7(3): Pp. 217-269.

Siyami, S., Brown, G. K. , Burgess, G. J., Gerrish, J. B., Tennes, B. R., Burton, C. L. and Zapp, R. H. (1987). Apple Impact Bruise Prediction Models. ASAE Paper No. 87-6019. St. Joseph, MI: ASAE.

Tongdee, S. C., Suwanagol, A. and Neamprem, S. (1991). Postharvest Handling of Tender Coconut. ASEAN Food Journal. Vol. 7(2): Pp. 74-75.

Yahia, E. M. (2011). Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Sub-Tropical Fruits. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition. Vol. 3: Pp. 15-17. Retrieved 28 November 2017 from

How to Cite
Pascua, A., Pascua, M., & Peralta, E. (2018). COMPRESSION DAMAGE THRESHOLD OF YOUNG COCONUT (Cocos nucifera L.) AT TWO MATURITY STAGES . International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 5(1), 8-19.