• Ubi S.E Department of Civil Engineering Cross River University of Technology (CRUTECH), Calabar.
  • Nkra P.O Department of Works, University of Calabar, Calabar.
  • Agbor R.B Environmental Biotechnology unit, Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, University of Calabar, Calabar
  • Ewa D.E Department of Civil Engineering Cross River University of Technology (CRUTECH), Calabar.
  • Nuchal M. Department of Civil Engineering Cross River University of Technology (CRUTECH), Calabar.
Keywords: Granite, Flexural Strength, Basalt, Coarse aggregate and Compressive Strength


This present research was on the comparison of the efficacious use of basalt and granite as coarse aggregates in concrete work. In order to obtain the basis for comparison, physical and structural tests were conducted on the different materials of the concrete and the concrete samples respectively. Physical test results revealed that basalt have a specific gravity of 2.8 and 2.5, while granite have a specific gravity of 2.9 and 2.6. In density, basalt have a density of 1554.55kg/m3 while granite had a density of 1463.64kg/m3. Aggregate impact test conducted on both aggregates revealed a percentage of 11.05% for basalt and 12.63% for granite. The following structural tests were carried out: compressive strength tests, flexural and tensile strength test and the comparative results are as follows. Compressive strength for basalt 36.39N/mm2 while 37.16N/mm2 for granite. 24.81N/mm2 tensile strength for basalt while 12.57N/mm2 for granite, 31.83N/mm2 flexural strength for basalt while 27.97N/mm2 for granite. From the above results, it can be deduced that basalt has higher strength properties than granite. Therefore, more suitable for coarse aggregate in achieving higher strength with some quantity of other composition of the concrete mix when compared to granite.


Download data is not yet available.


Dobiszewska M., Pichor W and Szoldra P. (2019): Effect of Basalt powder addition on properties of mortar. MATEC WEB of Conference, 262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926206002

Kasim M., Soram M., Dia E.N and Safia M.O (2017). Effect of aggregate properties on the mechanical and absoption characteristics of geopolymer mortar. Engineering science and Technology, an international Journal, 20(16):1642-1652.

Kumar Y.Y., Vardhan C.M.V and Anitha A. (2015). Use of granite waste as partial substitute to cement in concrete. International Journal of Engineering Research and Application 5(4):25-31

Krzysztof O., Lukasz S., Damian S., Daniel W., Tomasz G., Konrad O and Ireneusz U. (2018). Effect of the morphology of coarse aggregate on the properties of self-compacting high- performance Fibre-reinforced concrete. Material., 11(8): 1372

Mehdi M., Payam S and Muhammad A (2018). The optimum oil palm shell content as coarse aggregate in concrete based on mechanical and durability properties. Advances in Material Sciences and Engineering.

IS: 456 – 2000 (Fourth Revision) Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice.

IS: 10262-2009 (first revision), Concrete Mix Proportioning Guidelines.

IS: 383-1970 (Second Revision), Specifications for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Resources for Concrete.

Ramakanta S., Byung J.S., Ji S.I. and Chul W.L (2012). A review of recent advances in catalytic hydrocracking of heavy residues. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 27: 12-24

Sobera G. and Jose V., Relationship between gas adsorption and the shrinkage and creep of recycled aggregate concrete, Cement, Concrete & Aggregates 25 (2) (2003). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/CCA10442J

How to Cite
Ubi, S., Nkra, P., Agbor, R., Ewa, D., & Nuchal, M. (2020). EFFICACY OF BASALT AND GRANITE AS COARSE AGGREGATE IN CONCRETE MIXTURE. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 7(9), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v7.i9.2020.769