IJETMR
INHOMOGENEOUS COSMOLOGICAL PERFECT FLUID MODELS IN MODIFIED THEORY OF GENERAL RELATIVITY WITH TIME DEPENDENT-TERM

INHOMOGENEOUS COSMOLOGICAL PERFECT FLUID MODELS IN MODIFIED THEORY OF GENERAL RELATIVITY WITH TIME DEPENDENT-TERM

 

R. N. Patra 1

 

1 P.G. Department of Mathematics, Berhampur University, Odisha, India

 

A logo on a white background

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

A picture containing logo

Description automatically generated

ABSTRACT

The cosmological term is achieved with non-static inhomogeneous cosmological models when a perfect fluid generates the gravitational field's source. Einstein's field equations are solved for three physically significant examples (the vacuum cosmological model, the radiating cosmological model, and the Zeldevich model) using the gamma law equation of state.

 

Received 05 February 2023

Accepted 18 March 2023

Published 31 March 2023

Corresponding Author

R. N. Patra, raghunathpatra09@gmail.com

DOI 10.29121/ijetmr.v10.i3.2023.1314   

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

With the license CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.

 

Keywords: Inhomogeneous Cosmological Model, Perfect Fluid, Radiating Cosmological Model, Zeldevich Model


1. INTRODUCTION

Barber (1982) proposed his second self-creation theory of gravity, which modifies general relativity, in an effort to outperform Einstein's theory. The ideal fluid in this simplified theory of general relativity just splits the matter tensor as a reciprocal of the gravitational constant G, rather than gravitating directly. The local impacts shown in observational studies are predicted by this idea. Furthermore, by analysing the behaviour of photons and degenerate matter entities, this theory may be supported or denied. An accurate measurement of the deflection of light and radio waves passing near the sun, along with the discovery of anomalous precessions in pulsar orbits over central masses, would validate or invalidate such a notion. The theory predicts the perihelia of planets with the same precision as general relativity and in that regard; it is in agreement with observation to within 1%. In the limit .

In every way, this revised theory is similar to Einstein's theory. Many authors have examined the modified theory of general relativity from various perspectives. The Friedman-Barber field equations have been solved by Pimentel (1985) using the power law dependency of the scalar field on the scale factor as an assumption. In generalising Pimentel's work Pimentel (1985), Venkateswarlu & Reddy (1990), Soleng (1987) has obtained solutions for the vacuum-dominated, dust-filled universe of the flat FRW spase-time. Bianchi cosmological solutions of VIo type are found in the works of Reddy & Venkateswarlu (1989), both in vacuum and with perfect fluid pressure equivalent to the energy density. When the source of the gravitational field is a perfect fluid, Venkateswarlu & Reddy (1990) have also built spatially homogenous and anisotropic Bianchi type-1 cosmological macro models. 

Space homogeneous and anisotropic Bianchi type-II and III cosmological models have been obtained by Shanthi & Rao (1991) in both vacuum and stiff fluid conditions. Carvalho (1996) obtained a homogenous and isotropic model of the primitive universe in which the gamma parameter of the "gamma law" state equation continually varies with cosmological time. He also presented a unified description of the primitive universe between the inflationary period and the epoch dominated by radiation. Shri Ram & Singh (1998) have obtained a spatially homogeneous and isotropic R-W model of the universe in the presence of perfect fluid by using the ‘gamma law” equation of state. Mohanty et al. (2000) have obtained vacuum and Zeldovich fluid models for plane symmetric anisotropic homogeneous space-time. Mohanty et al. (2002), Mohanty et al. (2003) have obtained an anisotropic homogeneous Bianchi Type-1 cosmological micro model in Barber’s second theory of gravitation wherein the scalar field describes the elementary particles and their interactions Srivastav & Sinha (1998). Also, they have obtained a micro and macro cosmological model in the presence of a massless scalar field interacted with perfect fluid. Panigrahi & Sahu (2003), Panigrahi & Sahu (2002), Panigrahi & Sahu (2003), Panigrahi & Sahu (2004) have obtained plane symmetric inhomogeneous macro models in Barber’s second theory of gravitation. Sahu and Bianchi Type-1 vacuum models have been obtained by Sahu & Panigrahi (2003). Sahu & Panigrahi (2006), Sahu et al. (2010) have investigated Masonic perfect fluid models in modified theory of general relativity.

The vitality energy tensor of matter, which is produced by a idealize liquid, is ordinarily the subject of examination for relativistic models. But to get more reasonable models, one must consider the consistency component in cosmology has pulled in the consideration of numerous analysts because it can account for tall entropy of the display universe Weinberg (1971), Weinberg (1972). The tall entropy by baryon and the momentous degree of isotropy of microwave infinite foundation radiation recommends that dissipative impacts in cosmology ought to be considered. Furthermore, it's over here. Thick impacts are anticipated to happen due to a few forms. These are the decoupling of neutrinos amid the radiation time and the decay of matter and radiation amid the recombination time Kolb & Turner (1990), gravitational string generation Turok (1988) and Barrow (1988) and molecule creation impact within the terrific unification time. Murphy (1973) illustrated that the presentation of bulk thickness can anticipate the peculiarity of the enormous bang. therefore, one would need to consider the nearness of fabric dissemination other than the idealize liquid to get practical cosmological models (see Gron (1990)  for an audit of cosmological models with bulk consistency).

To our information none of the creators has examined the altered hypothesis of common relativity for plane symmetric inhomogeneous space time in nearness of idealize liquid with time subordinate term. In this paper, we have examined the consistency of this theory in the context of a perfect fluid.

 

2.  Field Equations

Here we consider the space time portrayed by inhomogeneous metric of the frame        

                                                                Equation 1

 

Where A, B are functions of ‘x’ and’ t’.

The field equations in Barbers second self-creation theory with time dependent cosmological constant are

                                                        Equation 2

 

Where  ,                                                                                            Equation 3

 

The vitality force tensor   for idealize liquid is given by

                                                                                      Equation 4

 

Together with                                                                                    Equation 5

 

In commoving co-ordinate system the surviving components of the field equations (2)-(5) for the space time (1) are

 

                                                          Equation 6

 

                                                                                                        Equation 7

 

                                 Equation 8

 

                         Equation 9

 

 

                Equation 10

 

Here after wards the prime (') and the subscript “4” denotes partial differentiation w.r.to x and t respectively.

In order to solve the field equations for obtaining solutions in explicit forms, we may consider different equation of state. As the metric potentials are functions of x and t, it is difficult to solve the field equations (6)-(10) for non-static case. Hence, we consider the following particular cases.

Case-1:

In this case the field equations (6)-(10) reduces to

                                                                        Equation 11

 

                                                                                     Equation 12

 

                                                                                        Equation 13

 

                                                Equation 14

Here we have the system of four equations in five unknowns. In order to make the system consistent, we take the help of gamma law equation of state

 

 

2.1. VACUUM MODEL 

For this case equations (11)-(14) reduce to

                                                                                      Equation 15

 

                                                                                                   Equation 16

 

                                                                                                     Equation 17

 

 .                                                                      Equation 18

 

Using equation (16) in equation (15), we obtain

                                                                                                         Equation 19

 

Integrating equation (19), we obtain

                                                                                                       Equation 20

 

Where are constants of integration.

Now using equation (20) in equation (17) we get

                                                                             Equation 21

 

For simplification if we consider  is a function of ‘t’ only then equation (18) reduce to

                                                                                                 Equation 22

 

With the help of equation (20), equation (22) reduces to

           

 

Integrating we get

 

Again integrating

                                                                            Equation 23

 

Where are constants of integration.

If we consider  is a function of ‘x’ only then equation (18) reduce to

                                                                                                          Equation 24

 

Integrating equation (2.4), we obtain

                                                                                                         Equation 25

 

Again integrating equation (25), we get

                                                                                 Equation 26

 

Where and are constants of integration.

If we consider  is a separable function of x and t and in the form of  with zero separable constant then the Barbers scalar  From equation (18) can be obtained as

                                                 Equation 27

 

Where is a constant of integration.

Further, if we are consider  is a separable function of x and t and in the form of with zero separable constant, then Barbers scalar   from equation (18),can be obtained as

.                               Equation 28

 

Hence the Vacuum cosmological model in second self creation theory of Barber can determined for any arbitrary metric potential.

 

2.2. Radiating Model:

In this case, equating equation (11) and (12), we find

                                                                                                  Equation 29

 

On integration, equation (29) yields

                                                                                                     Equation 30

 

where and are constants of integration. Now using (30) in equation (13), we obtain 

  

.                                                                   Equation 31

 

Further using equation (30) and in equation (14), we get

                                                                  Equation 32

 

For the simplification, if we consider then equation (32) reduces to

                                                                                            Equation 33

 

This yield on intrgration

                                                                                  Equation 34

 

Where and are constants of integration.

 If we consider, then equation (32) reduces to

                                                                                                   Equation 35

 

Which on integration yields

                                                                                  Equation 36

 

Where and are constants of integration.

Using (34) and (36) in equation (31), we get

       Equation 37

 

Or

             Equation 38

 

Also, if is a separarable function of x and t and in the form of  with zero separable constant then equation (32) yields

                                                 Equation 39

 

Where is a constant of integration.

Further, if we consider, then equation (32) yields

                              Equation 40

 

Hence the radiating cosmological model in second self creation theory of Barber can be determined for any arbitrary metric potential.

Using (39) and (40) in equation (31), we can get another two values of

 

2.3. Zeldevich Model:

       In this case the model doesn’t exist.

 

 

 

3. Conclusion

In this paper a plane symmetric inhomogeneous cosmological model has been constructed by taking perfect fluid along with time-depended cosmological constant term. Also, I have studied the consistency of this theory to the case of a perfect fluid in three different cases. The Vacuum and radiating cosmological model exists in second self creation theory of Barber and can be determined for any arbitrary metric potential, but in case of Zel’dovich model it doesn’t exist.

 

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

None. 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

None.

 

REFERENCES

Barber, G. A. (1982). On Two “Self-Creation” Cosmologies. Gen Relat Gravit 14, 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0075691.

Barrow, J. D. (1988). Nucl. Phys., B. 310, 743.

Carvalho, J. C. (1996). Unified Description of the Early Universe. Int J Theor Phys 35, 019–2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302426.

Gron, O. (1990). Viscous Inflationary Universe Models. Astrophys Space Sci 173, 191– 225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00643930.

Kolb, E. W., & Turner, M.S. (1990). The Early Universe, Additson – Wesley, U.S.A.

Mohanty, G., Mishra, B., Das, R. (2000). Bull. Inst. Math. Academia Sinica, 28,43.

Mohanty, G., Panigrahi, U. & Sahu, R. (2002). Exact Bianchi Type-I Cosmological Micro-Model in Modified Theory of General Relativity. Astrophysics and Space Science, 281, 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015858621340.                               

Mohanty, G., Sahu, R. & Panigrahi, U. (2003). Micro and Macro Cosmological Model in Barber's Second Self-Creation Theory. Astrophysics and Space Science 284, 1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023306103130.

Murphy, G.L. (1973). Phys. Rev., D 8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.8.4231.

Myung, S., & Cho, B.M. (1986). Mod. Phys. Lett., A 1, 37.

Panigrahi, U., & Sahu, R. (2004).  Plane Symmetric Cosmological Macro Models in Self-creation Theory of Gravitation. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 54, 543–551 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CJOP.0000024957.99564.97.

Panigrahi, U.K., & Sahu R. C. (2002). Science Letters, Allahabad, India, 25, 11, 12.

Panigrahi, U.K., & Sahu, R.C. (2003). Bull. Cal. Math. Soc. India, 95, 3, 183.

Panigrahi, U.K., & Sahu, R.C. (2003). Theo. And Appl. Mech., 30, 163.

Pimentel, L. O. (1985). Exact Self-Creation Cosmological Solutions. Astrophys Space Sci, 116, 395–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00653794.

Reddy, D.R.K., & Venkateswarlu, R. (1989). Astrophysc. Space Sci., 155, 135.

Sahu, R.C., Mohapatra, L.K., & Mohanty G. (2010). Romanian Reports in Physics, 62(2), 249-262.

Sahu, R.C, & Panigrahi, U. K. (2006). Astrophys Space Sci., 306, 179.

Sahu, R.C, & Panigrahi, U. K. (2003). Astrophys. Space Sci., 288, 601.

Shanthi, K., & Rao, V. U. M. (1991). Bianchi Type-II and III Models in Self-Creation Cosmology. Astrophys Space Sci 179, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642359.   

Shri Ram & Singh, C. P. (1998). Astrophys. Space Sci., 257, 123.

Soleng, H. H. (1987b). Astrophys. Space Sci., 102, 67.

Srivastav, S.K, & Sinha, K. P. (1998). Aspects of Gravitational Interactions, Horizons in World Physics, Noya Science Publishers Inc., Commack, New York, 225, 111.

Turok, N. (1988). Phys. Rev. Lett., 60, 549.  

Venkateswarlu, R., & Reddy, D. R. K. (1990). Bianchi Type-I Models in Self-Creation Theory of Gravitation. Astrophys Space Sci, 168, 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00636864.

Weinberg, S. (1971). Astronomical Physics Journal, 168, 175.

Weinberg, S. (1972). Gravitation and Cosmology, Wiley and Sons.

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

Creative Commons Licence This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

© IJETMR 2014-2023. All Rights Reserved.