“I CONTAIN MULTITUDES”: ABJECTION AND AFFECT IN NAMITA GOKHALE’S THE BLIND MATRIARCH (2021)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i9s.2026.7968Keywords:
Abjection, Affect, Semiotic, Symbolic, Bodily BoundariesAbstract [English]
This paper examines the interconnected themes of abjection and affects in Namita Gokhale's novel The Blind Matriarch. The themes of abject and affect have procured substantial importance in interpreting the negotiation of marginalized bodies within patriarchal and postcolonial settings. However, Namita Gokhale's novel The Blind Matriarch is well researched, but there has been limited attention to the combined study of all three theories. The paper examines the abject in Matangi Ma’s embodiment. It analyzes affect as emotional structuring. Further, it explores semiotic and symbolic spatial dynamics. The paper uses textual analysis and Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis for identifying themes within the text. Using this methodology, the primary text, The Blind Matriarch, is examined through a theoretical framework that includes theories of the Abject and Affect and an analysis of semiotic and symbolic aspects. The key finding of the paper reveals that the aspect of Matangi Ma's blindness is both marginalizing and empowering, where Matangi Ma is seen as a site of cultural contradiction. She also undermines various common conceptions of power, visibility, and gendered subjectivity. The paper concludes by showing how Matangi Ma reconfigures socio-cultural marginality through theoretical frameworks. These findings contribute to feminist literary studies by stressing the role of affect and abjection in interpreting marginalized experiences.
References
Ahern, S. (2024). Affect Theory and Literary Criticism. Emotion Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739241231934
Ahmad, M., and Nayab, S. (2019). Psychoanalysis as a Method of Reading Texts and Practices: A Descriptive Study. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(1).
Arya, R. (2014). Abjection and Representation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389342
Arya, R. (2017). Abjection Interrogated: Uncovering the Relation Between Abjection and Disgust. Journal of Extreme Anthropology, 1(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.5617/jea.4337
Beauvoir, S. de. (1949). The Second Sex. Librairie Gallimard.
Beebeejaun, Y. (2017). Gender, Urban Space, and the Right to Everyday Life. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.1255526
Bharatamuni. (1981). Nātyaśāstra.
Bhuvaneswari, M. R., and Raj, E. (2021). Post-Pandemic Gendering in Namita Gokhale’s The Blind Matriarch. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3).
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage.
Brennan, T. (2004). The Transmission of Affect. Cornell University Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. Routledge.
Frank, A. (1995). Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins. Critical Inquiry, 21(2), 496–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/448761
Freud, S. (1910). The Origin and Development of Psychoanalysis. https://doi.org/10.2307/1413001
Freud, S. (2024). The Interpretation of Dreams (Original Work Published 1900). Flame Tree Publishing.
Gokhale, N. (2022). The Blind Matriarch. Penguin Random House India.
Gokhale, N. (2025). About Namita Gokhale.
Hasan, L. R. (2021, November 12). Review: The Blind Matriarch by Namita Gokhale. Hindustan Times.
Ingraham, C. (2023). To Affect Theory. Capacious: Journal for Emerging Affect Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.22387/CAP2022.76
Jain, J. (2011). Indigenous Roots of Feminism. Sage Publications India.
Kristeva, J. (1966). Theory of Intertextuality.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Columbia University Press.
Lorber, J., and Martin, P. Y. (2013). The Socially Constructed Body: Insights from Feminist Theory. In SAGE Publications, Inc. eBooks ( 249–274). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335483.n11
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383574
Mavin, S., and Grandy, G. (2016). A Theory of Abject Appearance: Women Elite Leaders’ Intra-Gender Management of Bodies and Appearance. Human Relations, 69(5), 1095–1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715609107
McIlwain, D. (2007). Special Section: Pleasure in Mind. Theory and Psychology, 17(4), 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307079294
Modi, C. G. (2021, October 3). Book Review: Namita Gokhale’s The Blind Matriarch is a Compassionate Exploration of Life in Lockdown. Firstpost.
Patil, D. R. (2023). The Blind Matriarch: A Chronicle of Pandemic and Resilience. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology, 10(2).
Pilcher, J., and Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 Key Concepts in Gender Studies. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446278901
Polanyi, K. (2024). The Great Transformation. Penguin Classics.
Raj, P. E. (2015). Interrogating Julia Kristeva’s Concept of Intertextuality. Ars Artium: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 77–80.
Rathod, D. (2020). Deconstructing Maternal Semiotic and Paternal Symbolic: A Psycholinguistic Perspective for Social Refinement. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s24n5
Rooney, M. (2020). Interview with Adam J. Frank and Elizabeth A. Wilson. Australian Humanities Review, 67.
Rudge, T. (2015). Julia Kristeva: Abjection, Embodiment and Boundaries. In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks ( 504–519). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137355621_32
Sam, P. (2022). A Study of Namita Gokhale’s The Blind Matriarch. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 10(2), 21–xx.
Satchidanandan, K. (2021). Quote on The Blind Matriarch.
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smq37
Seraphina, M. K. (2015). The Abjection of Self: Julia Kristeva.
Tomkins, S. (1962). Affect Imagery Consciousness. Springer Publishing Company.
Woolf, V. (1925). Mrs. Dalloway. Hogarth Press.
Wrede, T. (2015). Introduction to Special Issue: Theorizing Space and Gender in the 21st Century. Rocky Mountain Review, 69(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/rmr.2015.a580801
Zengin, M. (2016). An Introduction to Intertextuality as a Literary Theory: Definitions, Axioms and the Originators. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 50, 299–327. https://doi.org/10.5505/pausbed.2016.96729
Ziarek, E. (1992). At the Limits of Discourse: Heterogeneity, Alterity, and the Maternal Body in Kristeva’s thought. Hypatia, 7(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1992.tb00600.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Deeksha Sharma, Dr. Keshav Nath
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
