INTELLIGENT ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS IN DIGITAL ART EDUCATION

Authors

  • Prachi Rashmi Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201306, India.
  • Sadhana Sargam Assistant Professor,School of Business Management, Noida international University 203201
  • Ms. Babitha BS Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Harsimrat Kandhari Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 174103, India
  • Sarita Agrawal Associate Professor, Department of Management Studies, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India,
  • Simranjeet Nanda Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India
  • Rajesh Raikwar Electrical Engg.Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, 411037 India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3s.2025.6781

Keywords:

Intelligent Assessment Systems, Digital Art Education, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Creative Evaluation Framework

Abstract [English]

During educational assessment, the Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become the new way of assessing creativity and skill, specifically in the teaching of digital art. This article discusses the development and application of Intelligent Assessment Systems (IAS) that have the capability of assessing artistic outputs objectively and holistically. Conventional approaches to art assessment are more subjective and thus hard to scale and be consistent. IAS offers a machine learning-based but customizable method of evaluating digital artworks by integrating both machine learning models and creative evaluation systems. The research question is based on how AI algorithms could explore the artistic parameters, including composition, color harmony, creativity and technical skill without contradicting the purposes of educators. Data were collected in digital art classrooms to train and validate the system through the use of a mixed-methods approach, that is, surveys, case studies, and experimental testing. The research design is based on the already developed educational assessment theories, artificial intelligence, and innovative cognition models in order to provide balanced measures of evaluation. Convolutional neural networks and feature extraction were created into a prototype system to evaluate visual artworks. Findings of pilot applications prove that intelligent assessment improves feedback quality and minimizes evaluation bias and provides personalized learning. The results point at the possibility of AI to enhance, as opposed to substitute, human teachers by providing objective information that will supplement expert feedback.

References

Chen, S., Lin, P., and Chien, W. (2022). Children’s Digital Art Ability Training System based on AI-Assisted Learning: A Case Study of Drawing Color Perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 102931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.102931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823078

Cong, S. (2024). A Study of Teaching Strategies Optimized with the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Technologies. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(2), 1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1195

Dai, Y., Liu, A., Qin, J., Guo, Y., Jong, M., Chai, C., 9 Lin, Z. (2022). Collaborative Construction of Artificial Intelligence Curriculum in Primary Schools. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20503

Engelsrud, G., Rugseth, G., and Nordtug, B. (2021). Taking Time for New Ideas: Learning Qualitative Research Methods in Higher Sports Education. Sport, Education and Society, 28(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1873157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.2014804

Ezquerra, Á., Agen, F., Rodríguez-Arteche, I., and Ezquerra-Romano, I. (2022). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Research on Emotions and Behaviors in Science Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em11927. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11927

García-Ull, F. J., and Melero-Lázaro, M. (2023). Gender Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images. Profesional de la Información, 32(5), e320503. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.05

Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2020). Generative Adversarial Networks. Communications of the ACM, 63(11), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3422622

Hanafy, N. O. (2023). Artificial Intelligence’s Effects on Design Process Creativity: A study on used AI Text-To-Image in Architecture. Journal of Building Engineering, 80, 107999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107999

Kahila, J., Vartiainen, H., Tedre, M., Arkko, E., Lin, A., Pope, N., Jormanainen, I., and Valtonen, T. (2024). Pedagogical Framework for Cultivating Children’s Data Agency and Creative Abilities in the Age of AI. Informatics in Education, 23(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.15

Liu, S. (2023). On the impact of AI Painting on the Field of Cultural Creativity. Contemporary Animation, 2(2), 91–95.

Liu, V., and Chilton, L. B. (2022). Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-To-Image Generative Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1–15). New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501825

O’Meara, J., and Murphy, C. (2023). Aberrant AI Creations: Co-Creating Surrealist Body Horror using the DALL-E Mini text-to-Image Generator. Convergence, 29(4), 1070–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221149757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231185865

Schetinger, V., Di Bartolomeo, S., El-Assady, M., McNutt, A., Miller, M., Passos, J. P. A., and Adams, J. L. (2023). Doom or Deliciousness: Challenges and Opportunities for visualization in the Age of Generative Models. Computer Graphics Forum, 42(3), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14841

Sukkar, A. W., Fareed, M. W., Yahia, M. W., Abdalla, S. B., Ibrahim, I., and Senjab, K. A. K. (2024). Analytical Evaluation of Midjourney Architectural Virtual lab: Defining Major Current Limits in AI-generated representations of Islamic architectural heritage. Buildings, 14(4), 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030786

Yin, H., Zhang, Z., and Liu, Y. (2023). The Exploration of Integrating the Midjourney Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Tool into Design Systems to Direct Designers Towards Future-Oriented Innovation. Systems, 11(12), 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120566

Zhang, B., Zhou, Y., Zhang, M., Chen, H., and Li, J. (2023). Review of Research on Improvement and Application of Generative Adversarial Networks. Applied Research in Computers, 40(5), 649–658.

Zhang, Y., and Liu, C. (2024). Unlocking the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Fashion Design and E-Commerce Applications: The Case of Midjourney. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 654–670. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010035

Zhang, Z., Wang, T., Guo, X., Liu, Z., and Chen, Y. (2024). Survey of AI Painting. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 18(9), 1404–1420.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Rashmi, P., Sargam, S., BS, B., Kandhari, H., Agrawal, S., Nanda, S., & Raikwar, R. (2025). INTELLIGENT ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS IN DIGITAL ART EDUCATION. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(3s), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3s.2025.6781