INTELLIGENT RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS FOR ART COURSES

Authors

  • Smitha K Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201306, India
  • Ms. Sunitha BK Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Pratibha Sharma Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India
  • Kalpana Munjal Associate Professor, Department of Design, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India
  • Deepak Minhas Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 174103, India
  • Paul Praveen AlbertSelva kumar Associate Professor School of Engineering and Technology, Noida International University 203201, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Abhijeet Deshpande Department of Mechanical Engineering Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, 411037 India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3s.2025.6761

Keywords:

Art Education, Hybrid AI Models, Affective Computing, Cognitive Modeling, Personalized Learning, Creative Pedagogy, Emotion-Aware AI

Abstract [English]

This paper will describe a detailed outline of an emotion-based intelligent recommendation system to suit the field of art education. The model proposed unites cognitive modeling, hybrid algorithms of AI, and affective computing to customize the art course recommendation, which fits the creative style and emotional interest of the learners. The system also allows adaptive, context-based learning through the integration of content based, collaborative and reinforcement learning methods with pedagogical reasoning. Experimental measurements prove that the hybrid model is more accurate (Precision@10 = 0.89, NDCG = 0.86) and high affective congruence (Affective Match Ratio = 0.83) compared to the classical approaches to recommendation. Qualitative measures also prove the increased attentiveness of learners, diversity of creativity, and emotional connection. The framework provides a platform of ethical, transparent, and compassionate AI in art pedagogy- developing human-AI cooperation to establish creativity, inclusivity, and contemplative art development.

References

Broos, T., Verbert, K., Langie, G., Van Soom, C., and De Laet, T. (2018). Multi-Institutional Positioning Test Feedback Dashboard for Aspiring Students: Lessons Learnt from a Case Study in Flanders. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (51–55). https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170419

Chen, X., Zheng, J., Du, Y., and Tang, M. (2020). Intelligent Course Plan Recommendation for Higher Education: A Framework of Decision Tree. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2020, Article 7140797. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7140797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7140797

Huang, L., Wang, C. D., Chao, H. Y., Lai, J. H., and Yu, P. S. (2019). A Score Prediction Approach for Optional Course Recommendation Via Cross-User-Domain Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Access, 7, 19550–19563. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897979

Ibrahim, M. E., Yang, Y., and Ndzi, D. (2017). Using Ontology for Personalised Course Recommendation Applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (426–438). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62392-4_31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62392-4_31

Jing, L., and Tang, J. (2017). Guess You Like: Course Recommendation in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence (783–789). https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106478

Lessa, L. F., and Brandão, W. C. (2018). Filtering Graduate Courses Based on Linkedin Profiles. In Proceedings of the 24th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (141–147). https://doi.org/10.1145/3243082.3243094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3243082.3243094

Li, W., Jiang, W., Chen, W., Wu, J., Wang, G., and Li, K. (2020). Directional and Explainable Serendipity Recommendation. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020 (122–132). https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380100

Lin, J., Pu, H., Li, Y., and Lian, J. (2018). Intelligent Recommendation System for Course Selection in Smart Education. Procedia Computer Science, 129, 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.03.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.03.023

Liu, T., Wilczyńska, D., Lipowski, M., and Zhao, Z. (2021). Optimization of a Sports Activity Development Model Using Artificial Intelligence Under New Curriculum Reform. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, Article 9049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179049

Liu, X., Du, Y., Sun, F., and Zhai, L. (2017). Design of Adaptive Learning System Based on Big Data. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078564.3078571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3078564.3078571

Millecamp, M., Gutiérrez, F., Charleer, S., Verbert, K., and De Laet, T. (2018). A Qualitative Evaluation of a Learning Dashboard to Support Advisor–Student Dialogues. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (56–60). https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170417

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., and The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Molontay, R., Horváth, N., Bergmann, J., Szekrényes, D., and Szabó, M. (2020). Characterizing Curriculum Prerequisite Networks by a Student Flow Approach. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13, 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2020.2981331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2020.2981331

Nafea, S. M., Siewe, F., and He, Y. (2019). On Recommendation of Learning Objects Using Felder–Silverman Learning Style Model. IEEE Access, 7, 163034–163048. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935417

Polyzou, A., Nikolakopoulos, A. N., and Karypis, G. (2019). Scholars Walk: A Markov Chain Framework for Course Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3291016

Slim, J., Kozlick, G. L., Heileman, G. L., and Abdallah, C. T. (2014). The Complexity of University Curricula According to Course Cruciality. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (242–248). https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2014.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2014.34

Venugopalan, S., Srinath, M., and Rodrigues, P. (2016). Recommender System for E-Learning Through Content- and Profile-Based Approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies (1–5). https://doi.org/10.1145/2905055.2905103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2905055.2905103

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

K, S., BK, S., Sharma, P., Munjal, K., Minhas, D. ., AlbertSelva kumar, P. P. ., & Deshpande, A. (2025). INTELLIGENT RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS FOR ART COURSES. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(3s), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3s.2025.6761