INTEGRATING GENERATIVE AI INTO ART PEDAGOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3s.2025.6760Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Art Pedagogy, Hybrid Pedagogical Model (HPM-AI), AI-Based Creative Learning, Ethical Art Education, Human–AI Collaboration, Cultural Integrity, Reflective Creativity, Symbiotic IntelligenceAbstract [English]
The present paper suggests an all-encompassing model of applying the Generative Artificial Intelligence in art education in the form of Hybrid Pedagogical Model of AI-Art Learning (HPM-AI). The model reformulates creativity as a collaborative activity between the human intent and algorithmic production, focusing on reflective learning, ethical consciousness and open participation. The analysis of the study brings together the cognitive theory, computational modeling, as well as case-based validation, which is why the study proves that generative AI can improve the diversity of creativity but without cultural and moral responsibility. Three contexts of implementation that included an AI-based design studio, a course on digital heritage restoration, and community-based art workshops were evaluated to determine the flexibility of the framework and its effect on pedagogy. Quantitative visualizations and qualitative thoughts show that HPM-AI contributes to different educational goals in settings: the conceptual innovation of studio learning, the cultural integrity of the practice of restoration, and the inclusive creative empowerment of the learning environment. The paper also discusses implications on authorship, data ethics, and psychology of the learner, that AI should not be viewed as a substitute to artistic skill, and instead it is an intelligent companion, which reflects and magnifies human imagination. The paper concludes, that the ethical design of generative AI in creative education, interdisciplinary faculty development and institutional transparency are the necessary conditions of sustainable integration. HPM-AI framework, therefore, promotes an image of symbiotic creativity, placing art pedagogy on a crossroad of human cognition in relation to cultural continuity in connection with the computational intelligence.
References
AlGerafi, M. A., Zhou, Y., Alfadda, H., and Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Understanding the Factors Influencing Higher Education Students’ Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence-Based Robots. IEEE Access, 11, 99752–99764. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3314499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3314499
Bergdahl, J., Latikka, R., Celuch, M., Savolainen, I., Soares Mantere, E., Savela, N., and Oksanen, A. (2023). Self-Determination and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence: Cross-National and Longitudinal Perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 82, Article 102013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102013
Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., and Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence Trends in Education: A Narrative Overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
Chen, L., Chen, P., and Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Choi, W., Jang, S., Kim, H. Y., Lee, Y., Lee, S.-G., Lee, H., and Park, S. (2023). Developing an Ai-Based Automated Fashion Design System: Reflecting the Work Process of Fashion Designers. Fashion and Textiles, 10, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-023-00360-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-023-00360-w
Francis, N. J., Jones, S., and Smith, D. P. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81, Article 14048. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048
Ivanova, M., Grosseck, G., and Holotescu, C. (2024). Unveiling Insights: A Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence in teaching. Informatics, 11(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11010010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11010010
Jauhiainen, J. S., and Guerra, A. G. (2024). Generative AI and Education: Dynamic Personalization of Pupils’ School Learning Material with ChatGPT. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1288723. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723
Kulkarni, N. D., and Tupsakhare, P. (2024). Crafting Effective Prompts: Enhancing AI performance Through Structured Input Design. Journal of Recent Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.70589/JRTCSE.2024.5.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70589/JRTCSE.2024.5.1
Limna, P., Jakwatanatham, S., Siripipattanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., and Sriboonruang, P. (2022). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education During the Digital Era. Advances in Knowledge for Executives, 1, 1–9.
Millet, K., Buehler, F., Du, G., and Kokkoris, M. D. (2023). Defending Humankind: Anthropocentric Bias in the Appreciation of AI art. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, Article 107707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107707
Morales-Chan, M. A. (2023). Explorando El Potencial De ChatGPT: Una Clasificación de Prompts Efectivos Para La Enseñanza. Universidad Galileo.
Roll, I., and Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
Sharma, R. C., Kawachi, P., and Bozkurt, A. (2019). The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Open, Online and Distance Education: Promises and Concerns. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 14, 1–2.
Sindermann, C., Sha, P., Zhou, M., Wernicke, J., Schmitt, H. S., Li, M., Sariyska, R., Stavrou, M., Becker, B., and Montag, C. (2021). Assessing the Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence: Introduction of a Short Measure in German, Chinese, and English Language. KI – Künstliche Intelligenz, 35, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00689-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00689-0
Wang, Y., and Yang, S. (2024). Constructing and Testing AI International Legal Education Coupling-Enabling Model. Sustainability, 16(4), Article 1524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041524
Zhang, C., Yao, C., Wu, J., Lin, W., Liu, L., Yan, G., and Ying, F. (2022). StoryDrawer: A Child-AI Collaborative Drawing System to Support Children’s Creative Visual Storytelling. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501914
Zlatkov, D., Ens, J., and Pasquier, P. (2023). Searching for Human Bias Against Ai-Composed Music. In C. Johnson, N. Rodríguez-Fernández, and S. M. Rebelo (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 13988, 308–323). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29956-8_20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29956-8_20
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Trapti Tak, Mridula Gupta, Priya Gupta, Fehmina Khalique, Dr. Priya Bajpai, Prateek Aggarwal, Tushar Jadhav
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
