AUTOMATED LAYOUT DESIGN USING AI SYSTEMS

Authors

  • Danish Kundra Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India
  • Aarushi Thusu Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering(AIML), Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Thiagarajan C Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering,Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation(DU), Tamil Nadu, India
  • Dr. Ramesh Sengodan Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Presidency University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Deepak Minhas Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 174103, India
  • Punam Jagdish Patil Department of Instrumentation, Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Engineering, Maharashtra, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i2s.2025.6711

Keywords:

Automated Layout Design, Artificial Intelligence, Generative Adversarial Networks (Gans), Reinforcement Learning (Rl), Optimization Algorithms, Design Automation

Abstract [English]

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems that facilitate the automated layout design are a major breakthrough in design automation in a variety of areas, including architecture, industrial design, electronics, and digital interfaces. The conventional layout design procedures are based on human skills and manual corrections that are time consuming and can be subject to subjective judgements. The more recent advances of the AI, especially in machine learning and deep learning, have allowed systems to create, analyze, and optimize the layout configurations with little human involvement. The current paper gives a detailed structure of automated layout design incorporating generative adversarial networks (GANs), reinforcement learning (RL), and optimization algorithms. The suggested methodology entails data pre-processing methods, model training processes, and analysis metrics to determine the quality of designs, efficiency, and adaptability of the design. Implementation phase shows the interaction with the currently used design tools, which shows the ability of the system to come up with layouts that are aesthetically appealing, functional, and space conscious. Its applications in industry and architecture at the VLSI/PCB layout and dynamic web interface designs. Moreover, the paper examines the possibilities of using multimodal AI systems in real-time adaptive layouts, cross-domain generalization, and scalable implementation. The proposed system will fill the gap between computational intelligence and creative design concepts to increase productivity, consistency and innovativeness in the layout creation to provide a platform in the future research field of intelligent design automation.

References

Aheleroff, S., Huang, H., Xu, X., and Zhong, R. Y. (2022). Toward Sustainability and Resilience with Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0. Frontiers in Manufacturing Technology, 2, 951643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmfg.2022.951643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmtec.2022.951643

Besbes, M., Zolghadri, M., Affonso, R. C., Masmoudi, F., and Haddar, M. (2021). 3D Facility Layout Problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32, 1065–1090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01603-z

Burggräf, P., Adlon, T., and Schäfer, N. (2024). Towards Digital-Twin-Driven Factory Planning–A Systematic Review. Procedia CIRP, 126, 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.06.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.334

Cañas, H., Mula, J., Díaz-Madroñero, M., and Campuzano-Bolarín, F. (2021). Implementing Industry 4.0 Principles. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 158, 107379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107379

Coelho, P., Bessa, C., Landeck, J., and Silva, C. (2023). Industry 5.0: The Arising of a Concept. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.312

Heinbach, B., Burggräf, P., and Wagner, J. (2023). Deep Reinforcement Learning for Layout Planning–An MDP-Based Approach for the Facility Layout Problem. Manufacturing Letters, 38, 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.09.007

Heinbach, B., Burggräf, P., and Wagner, J. (2024). Gym-Flp: A Python Package for Training Reinforcement Learning Algorithms on Facility Layout Problems. Operations Research Forum, 5, 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-024-00301-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-024-00301-3

Hu, F. (2022). Mutual Information-Enhanced Digital Twin Promotes Vision-Guided Robotic Grasping. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 52, 101562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101562

Hu, F., Wang, W., and Zhou, J. (2023). Petri Nets-Based Digital Twin Drives Dual-Arm Cooperative Manipulation. Computers in Industry, 147, 103880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103880

Hu, F. (2022). Digital Twin-Driven Reconfigurable Fixturing Optimization for Trimming Operation of Aircraft Skins. Aerospace, 9(12), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9120154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9030154

Hu, F., Qiu, X., Jing, G., Tang, J., and Zhu, Y. (2023). Digital Twin-Based Decision-Making Paradigm of Raise Boring Method. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 34, 2387–2405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02173-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01941-0

Klar, M., Langlotz, P., and Aurich, J. C. (2022). A Framework for Automated Multiobjective Factory Layout Planning using Reinforcement Learning. Procedia CIRP, 112, 555–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.099

Lind, A., Hanson, L., Högberg, D., Lämkull, D., Mårtensson, P., and Syberfeldt, A. (2023). Digital Support for Rules and Regulations When Planning and Designing Factory Layouts. Procedia CIRP, 120, 1445–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.04.341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.09.191

Pérez-Gosende, P., Mula, J., and Díaz-Madroñero, M. (2024). A Bottom-Up Multi-Objective Optimisation Approach to Dynamic Facility Layout Planning. International Journal of Production Research, 62, 626–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.xxx.xxx DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2168308

Salins, S. S., Zaidi, S. A. R., Deepak, D., and Sachidananda, H. K. (2024). Design of an Improved Layout for a Steel Processing Facility using SLP and Lean Manufacturing Techniques. International Journal of Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 18, 3827–3848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-01828-9

Suleiman, Z., Shaikholla, S., Dikhanbayeva, D., Shehab, E., and Turkyilmaz, A. (2022). Industry 4.0: Clustering of Concepts and Characteristics. Cogent Engineering, 9(1), 2034264. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2034264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2034264

Wang, W. Y., Zhang, S., Li, G., Lu, J., Ren, Y., Wang, X., Gao, X., Su, Y., Song, H., and Li, J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Enabled Smart Design and Manufacturing of Advanced Materials: The Endless Frontier in AI+ era. Materials Genome Engineering Advances, 2, e56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mgea.56

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Kundra, D., Thusu, A., Thiagarajan C, Sengodan, R., Minhas, D., & Patil, P. J. (2025). AUTOMATED LAYOUT DESIGN USING AI SYSTEMS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(2s), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i2s.2025.6711