A PILOT STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ENAM ON FARM PRODUCE MARKETING AND FARMER WELLBEING IN MAHARASHTRA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.6094Keywords:
Enam, Agricultural Marketing, Farmer Wellbeing, Digital Agriculture, Price RealizationAbstract [English]
The agricultural marketing landscape in India has undergone a significant transformation with the introduction of the Electronic National Agriculture Market (eNAM), aiming to create a unified national market for agricultural commodities. This pilot study investigates the impact of eNAM on farm produce marketing and farmer wellbeing in the state of Maharashtra. By analyzing primary data collected from 150 farmers across three major eNAM-integrated mandis—Pune, Nashik, and Nagpur—the study evaluates key parameters such as market access, price realization, transaction efficiency, digital literacy, and satisfaction levels. The findings reveal a notable increase in average price realization per quintal, greater participation in inter-state trading, and enhanced transparency in price discovery mechanisms post-eNAM adoption. Additionally, the reduction in dependency on intermediaries has led to improved profit margins and a higher sense of empowerment among farmers. However, infrastructural gaps, inconsistent grading and assaying practices, and digital skill disparities remain significant barriers. The study also highlights a positive correlation between eNAM participation and indicators of farmer wellbeing, including financial stability, market confidence, and access to timely market information. Overall, while eNAM presents a promising shift towards digital and inclusive agricultural marketing, its success hinges on the harmonization of state-level reforms, robust infrastructure, and targeted capacity-building interventions. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders aiming to strengthen digital agricultural ecosystems in India.
References
S. S. Pawar and S. G. Walke, “ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNCTIONING OF THE eNAM PORTAL IN MAHARASHTRA FOR STRENGTHENING THE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SECTOR”, jcrr, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–16, Feb. 2023.
Quan, T.; Jia, W.; Quan, T.; Xu, Y. Impact of Farmers’ Participation in the Transformation of the Farmland Transfer Market on the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101677
Eanes, F.R.; Singh, A.S.; Bulla, B.R.; Ranjan, P.; Fales, M.; Wickerham, B.; Doran, P.J.; Prokopy, L.S. Crop advisers as conservation intermediaries: Perceptions and policy implications for relying on nontraditional partners to increase US farmers’ adoption of soil and water conservation practices. Land Use Policy 2019, 81, 360–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.054
Yang, C.F.; Ji, X.; Cheng, C.M.; Liao, S.; Bright, O.; Zhang, Y.F. Digital economy empowers sustainable agriculture: Implications for farmers’ adoption of ecological agricultural technologies. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 159, 111723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111723
Li, X.K.; Guo, H.D.; Jin, S.Q.; Ma, W.L.; Zeng, Y.W. Do farmers gain internet dividends from E-commerce adoption? Evidence from China. Food Policy 2021, 101, 102024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102024
Donkor, E.; Onakuse, S.; Bogue, J.; De Los Rios-Carmenado, I. Fertiliser adoption and sustainable rural livelihood improvement in Nigeria Chock. Land Use Policy 2019, 88, 104193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104193
Bai, Z.M.; Zhang, X.C.; Xu, J.B.; Li, C.X. Can Farmland Transfer Reduce Fertilizer Nonpoint Source Pollution? Evidence from China. Land 2024, 13, 798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060798
Warsaw, P.; Archambault, S.; He, A.; Miller, S. The Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Farmers Markets: Recent Evidence from the US. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063423
Deller, S.C.; Lamie, D.; Stickel, M. Local foods systems and community economic development. Community Dev. 2017, 48, 612–638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2017.1373136
Freedman, D.A.; Flocke, S.; Shon, E.; Matlack, K.; Trapl, E.; Ohri-Vachaspati, P.; Osborne, A.; Borawski, E. Farmers’ Market Use Patterns Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients with High Access to Farmers Markets. J. Nutr. Ed. Behav. 2017, 49, 397–404. [Green Version] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2017.01.007
Feng, Y.; Geng, Y.; Liang, Z.; Shen, Q.; Xia, X. Research on the Impacts of Heterogeneous Environmental Regulations on Green Productivity in China: The Moderating Roles of Technical Change and Efficiency Change. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111449
Huang, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, X. Study on the impacts of government policy on farmers’ pesticide application behavior. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2016, 26, 148–155.
Lu, Y.; Tan, Y.; Wang, H. Impact of Environmental Regulation on Green Technology Adoption by Farmers Microscopic Investigation Evidence from Pig Breeding in China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 885933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.885933
Liu, Y.; Chen, R.; Chen, Y.; Yu, T.; Fu, X. Impact of the Degree of Agricultural Green Production Technology Adoption on Income: Evidence from Sichuan Citrus Growers. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 1160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03693-z
Ikram, M.; Ferasso, M.; Sroufe, R.; Zhang, Q. Assessing Green Technology Indicators for Cleaner Production and Sustainable Investments in a Developing Country Context. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 322, 129090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129090
Wonde, K.M.; Tsehay, A.S.; Lemma, S.E. Training at farmers training centers and its impact on crop productivity and households’ income in Ethiopia: A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09837
Gelu, D.G.; Gebre, G.G. Impact of adopting wheat row planting on yield among smallholder farmers in Dawuro Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 25, 13149–13169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02608-9
Baul, T.; Karlan, D.; Toyama, K.; Vasilaky, K. Improving smallholder agriculture via video-based group extension. J. Dev. Econ. 2024, 169, 103267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103267
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siddhesh Sadashiv Pawar, Dr. Shrikrishna Gulabrao Walke
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
