BETWEEN IMITATION AND RESISTANCE: EARLY INDIAN ENGLISH LITERATURE UNDER BRITISH COLONIAL RULE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.6079Keywords:
British Colonialism, Indian English Literature, Imitation, Resistance, Hybrid Voice, Macaulay’s Minute, Colonial Education, Nationalist Literature, Cultural Identity, Postcolonial DiscourseAbstract [English]
This article explores the complex evolution of early Indian English literature during the British colonial period, focusing on the thematic tension between imitation and resistance. Introduced through colonial education policies such as Macaulay’s Minute of 1835, English became both a tool of imperial control and a medium for Indian self-expression. Early Indian writers, shaped by missionary and colonial institutions, initially adopted Western literary forms and language, imitating British models in poetry, prose, and narrative structure. However, this phase of imitation gradually gave way to nuanced forms of resistance, as Indian authors infused their works with indigenous themes, cultural pride, and social critique. Through hybrid literary expressions that merged Indian traditions with English idioms, writers negotiated between two worlds—asserting native identity while engaging with colonial modernity. This hybrid voice laid the foundation for a transition toward nationalist literature in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, where English was used more assertively to challenge colonial ideologies and articulate visions of independence. The article concludes that early Indian English literature, though born in the crucible of colonialism, played a vital role in shaping India’s literary and political awakening, leaving a lasting legacy in the canon of postcolonial literature.
References
Alam, F. (2008). Imperial entanglements and literature in English. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 2(2), 25-37.
Anjaria, U. (2012). Realism in the Twentieth-Century Indian Novel: Colonial Difference and Literary Form. Cambridge University Press.
Bhatia, N. (2010). Acts of Authority/Acts of Resistance: Theater and Politics in Colonial and Postcolonial India. University of Michigan Press.
Boehmer, E. (Ed.). (1998). Empire Writing: an anthology of colonial literature 1870-1918. OUP Oxford.
Cohn, B. S. (2021). Colonialism and its forms of knowledge: The British in India.
Dharwadker, V. (2003). The historical formation of Indian-English literature. Literary cultures in history: Reconstructions from South Asia, 199-267.
Granqvist, R. (1995). Imitation as Resistance: Appropriations of English Literature in Nineteenth-Century America. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press.
Jha, P. (1983). Colonialism, Literary Models and Literary Production: Notes on Shakespeare's' Influence'on Modern Indian Drama. Archív Orientální, 51, 226-239.
Sengupta, A. (2011). Nation, Fantasy, and Mimicry: Elements of Political Resistance in Postcolonial Indian Cinema.
Sharpe, J. (1989). Figures of colonial resistance. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 35(1), 137-155.
Thakur, V. S. (2012). From ‘Imitation’to ‘Indigenization’: A Study of Shakespeare Performances in Colonial Calcutta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vishvanath, Dr. Kantharaja K P

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.