THE RESOURCE CURSE HYPOTHESIS

Authors

  • Pankaj Khandelwal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.5531

Keywords:

Resource Curse Hypothesis, Economic Growth, Dutch Disease

Abstract [English]

The abundance of natural resources is often considered a key driver of a country’s economic growth and development. Resource-rich nations are believed to benefit from increased investment, accelerated industrialization, and expanded employment opportunities, fuelled by the rents generated from these resources. However, academic literature highlights a critical insight: possessing abundant natural resources does not necessarily guarantee economic growth. Drawing on vast literature the paper argues that weak institutional quality, rent-seeking behaviour and political distortions often negate the potential benefits of resource wealth. The paper further explores political economy models that explain this phenomenon, including the Dutch Disease effect, centralized and decentralized political economy models and theories such as the Rentier State, Staple Trap, Dependency and Institutional theories. Our analysis highlights the critical importance of transparent governance, accountable institutions and strategic investments in human development to convert natural wealth into inclusive and sustainable growth.

References

Auty, R. M. (1997). ‘Natural resource endowment, the state and development strategy.’ Journal of International Development, 9, 651–663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199706)9:4<651::AID-JID474>3.0.CO;2-4

Auty, R. M. (2001). ‘The political economy of resource driven growth.’ European Economic Review, 45, 839–846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00126-X

Behera, B. & Mishra, P. (2012). Natural Resource Abundance in the Indian States: Curse or Boon?. Review of Development and Change. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972266120120104

Bulte, E. H., Damania, R., and Deacon, R. T. (2005). ‘Resource intensity, institutions, and development.’ World Development, 33, 1029–1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.004

Collier, P. & Hoeffler, A. (2005). ‘Resource rents, governance, and conflict.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49, 625–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002705277551

Haseeb, M., Kot, S., Hussain, H.I., and Kamarudin, F. (2021). ‘The Natural Resources Curse- Economic Growth Hypotheses: Quartile-on-Quartile Evidence from Top Asian Economies.’ Journal of Cleaner Production, 279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123596

Hodler, R. (2006). ‘The curse of natural resources in fractionalized countries.’ European Economic Review, 50, 1367–1386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.05.004

Jensen, N. and Wantchekon, L. (2004). ‘Resource wealth and political regimes in Africa.’ Comparative Political Studies, 37, 816–841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004266867

Kolios, B. (2017). ‘The Resource Curse Hypothesis and Welfare: A Panel Data Analysis.’ Journal of Empirical Economics, 5, 163-168.

Kolstad, I. & Wiig, Arne. (2009). Political Economy Models of the Resource Curse: Implications for Policy and Research. South African Institute of International Affairs. Occasional Paper No. 40.

Nichofoung, T., Achuo, E., and Asongu, S., (2021). ‘Resource Rents and Inclusive Human Development in Developing Countries.’ MPRA Working Paper No. 110139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3839911

Sachs, J. D. and Warner, A. M. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth. NBER working paper, no. 5398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w5398

Sharma, C., and Pal, D., (2021). ‘Revisiting Resource Curse Puzzle: New Evidence From Heterogeneous Panel Analysis.’ Applied Economics, 53(8), 897-912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1817309

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Pankaj Khandelwal. (2024). THE RESOURCE CURSE HYPOTHESIS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(4), 1855–1859. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.5531