A CROSS-SECTIONAL RESEARCH ON THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF RACKET GAMES AND COMBAT SPORTS PLAYERS

Authors

  • Maninder Singh Research Scholar, Sant Baba Bhag Singh University, Village: Khiala, PO: Padhiana, Distt: Jalandhar
  • Dr. Manjit Kaur Assistant Professor, Sant Baba Bhag Singh University, Village: Khiala, PO: Padhiana, Distt: Jalandhar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.5077

Keywords:

Mental Toughness, Racket Games, Combat Sports, Players

Abstract [English]

The purpose if this study was to determine the difference of Mental Toughness of Racket Games and Combat Sports Players. A total of three hundred male participants (N=300), aged 18 to 25, from universities in the northern region of India, were involved in the study. Additionally, these participants were divided into the following groups: Group: A: Racket Games (N1=150) and Group B: Combat Sports (N2=150). The current investigation employed the independent t-test. In hypothesis testing, 0.05 was used as the significance criterion. Self-Confidence: No significant variance difference (p = .871), so "Equal variances assumed" is used. The t-test is not significant (p = .625), indicating no meaningful difference in self-confidence. Motivation: No significant variance difference (p = .535), so "Equal variances assumed" is used. The t-test is not significant (p = .111), indicating no significant difference in motivation between the groups. Attention Control: No significant variance difference (p = .502), so "Equal variances assumed" is used. The t-test is not significant (p = .547), suggesting no meaningful difference in attention control. Goal Setting: No significant variance difference (p = .525), so "Equal variances assumed" is used. The t-test is not significant (p = .699), indicating no significant difference in goal-setting ability. Visual and Imagery Control: No significant variance difference (p = .428), so "Equal variances assumed" is used. The t-test is not significant (p = .273), suggesting no meaningful difference in visual and imagery control. Attitude Control: No significant variance difference (p = .811), so "Equal variances assumed" is used. The t-test is not significant (p = .119), indicating no meaningful difference in attitude control. Mental Toughness Total: No significant variance difference (p = .678), so "Equal variances assumed" is used. The t-test is not significant (p = .835), suggesting no significant difference in overall mental toughness.

References

Crust, L., & Clough, P. J. (2011). Developing mental toughness: From research to practice. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 2(1), 21–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2011.563436

Gucciardi, D. F. (2017). Mental toughness: Progress and prospects. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 17–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.010

Gucciardi, D. F., Hanton, S., Gordon, S., Mallett, C. J., & Temby, P. (2016). The concept of mental toughness: Tests of dimensionality, nomological network, and traitness. Journal of Personality, 84(1), 18–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t55642-000

Jones, G., Hanton, S., & Connaughton, D. (2007). A framework of mental toughness in the world's best performers. The Sport Psychologist, 21(2), 243–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.21.2.243

Mahoney, J. W., Gucciardi, D. F., Ntoumanis, N., & Mallet, C. J. (2014). Mental toughness in sport: Motivational antecedents and associations with performance and psychological health. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(3), 281–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0260

St Clair-Thompson, H. L., Bugler, M., Robinson, J., Clough, P. J., & McGeown, S. P. (2015). Mental toughness in education: Exploring relationships with attainment, attendance, behaviour and peer relationships. Educational Psychology, 35(7), 886–907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.895294

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Singh, M., & Kaur, M. (2024). A CROSS-SECTIONAL RESEARCH ON THE MENTAL TOUGHNESS OF RACKET GAMES AND COMBAT SPORTS PLAYERS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(6), 1877–1882. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.5077