GENETIC PRIVACY- AN ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE ENDEAVOURS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i5.2024.3897Keywords:
Privacy,, Dna,, Personal Information, Data.Abstract [English]
Primary evidence is one of the pillars of the Criminal Justice Administration upon which the conviction and acquittal can solely depend. If this primary evidence is in the form of a bodily fluid, hair, fingerprint, nail, saliva etc. it can ascertain the culpability beyond a reasonable doubt. It is pertinent to mention here that our constitution provides a safeguard to the accused in the manner of fundamental rights. This “right” found its nexus in the ever-growing ever-evolving right to life and personal liberty, which very recently was a matter of determination in the Supreme Court by the issue of the right to privacy. The Puttaswamy judgment recognizes multiple facets of the right to privacy and within it the right to preserve “personal information”. It recognizes “personal information” as “data” that should be protected by the State and not misused as means of state surveillance. With this affirmation of data, DNA is genetic data, the Personal Data Protection Bill 2018 and another in 2019, which is the new initiative by State to strengthen the already existing data protection regime. A bare reading of the provisions of this bill can be dubbed as ambiguous and confusing to say the least and recognition to the fact that DNA is “Data” is absent. A careful and thorough reading of the bills is required to further analyze in depth the frontiers of DNA privacy in reference to the stakeholders in the criminal justice system.
On the same lines, the Criminal (Procedure) Identification Bill was recently introduced in the lower house all set to repeal the Identification of Prisoners Act 1920. The objective with which this bill is introduced is to quote-unquote expand the definitions of persons whose measurements can be recorded and stored by the law enforcement agencies as admissible evidence and to subsequently arrive to the conclusion of incarceration. The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Bill seeks to achieve high conviction rates as it boastfully states in its draft.
This paper shall deal with the critical analysis of the provisions of the DNA Technology (Use and Application) Bill 2019, the Data Protection Bill (pertaining to genetic data only) and the newest edition to this list the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act 2022.
References
Bishnoi, A. (2020). The DNA Technology (Use & Application) Regulation Bill, 2019 Vis-a-Vis Data Privacy. Pragyaan: Journal of Law, 68.
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1 (Supreme Court), [169].
Tharoor, S. (2018). The DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, 2018 [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved March 26, 2020, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifO2nlY_2QY
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act No. 1 of 1872) s. 108; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Act No. 25 of 1955) s. 13(1).
The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, No. 11 of 2022.
Bhatia, G. (2022, June 4). Rethink the Criminal Identification Bill. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/opinion/rethink-the-criminal-identification-bill-101648995338679.html
Criminal Procedure (Identification) Bill, 2022. (2022, June 4). PRS Legislative Research. Retrieved from https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-criminal-procedure-identification-bill-2022
Criminal Procedure (Identification) Bill, n 12.
Project 39A. (2022, June 3). Research Brief: An Analysis of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Bill, 2022. National Law University Delhi. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5a843a9a9f07f5ccd61685f3/t/6246bd9d8ccac84dd8c11f3e/1648803256217/P39A+Brief+-+Criminal+Procedure+%28Identification%29+Bill%2C+2022.pdf
Gupta, P. (2022). Critical Analysis of the DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, 2019. Part 1 Indian J. Integrated Rsch. L., 2, 1.
Saxena, S. (2022). Evidentiary Value of DNA & Critical Analysis of DNA Technology (Use & Application) Regulation Bill, 2018. Issue 4 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 5, 167.
Srivastava, A., Harshey, A., Das, T., Kumar, A., Yadav, M. M., & Shrivastava, P. (2022). Impact of DNA evidence in criminal justice system: Indian legislative perspectives. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 12(1), 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-022-00309-y
Juyal, R. (2021). Regulation & Use of DNA Profiling in India. QMLJ, 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26494/QMLJ3940
Jain, A. (2023). A Critical Analysis of DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, 2019. , No. 1 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 6, 467.
Kaur, A., & Pradhan, M. (2023). Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act 2022-A Critical Analysis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-083X.2023.00061.1
Karuppasamy, R. (2023). The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2021-Boon or Bane. Issue 3 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 6, 3469.
Akhila, S., & MN, D. S. (2024). LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (IDENTIFICATION) ACT, 2022.
Bang, K. K. (2023). Drawbacks of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022. Issue 4 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 6, 1838.
Chhabra, N. (2022). Potentiality of the New Criminal Identification Act, 2022 in Establishing a System of Vigilance. Issue 4 Indian JL & Legal Rsch., 4, 1.
Sharma, S. (2022). Exploration of Legal Aspect in the Criminal Procedure Identification Bill: Infringement of Rights. Issue 4 Indian JL & Legal Rsch., 4, 1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ms Medha Singh, Ms. Deepa Dubey

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.