विकासवादी रणनीति, आदिवासी, न्यायः पहचान का संघर्ष

Rohit

doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.3742

Authors

Rohit Research Scholar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.3742

Abstract [English]

The issue of community rights of tribals in India is linked to social justice and the existence and identity of the original inhabitants of the society, which cannot be ignored from discussion today. Because today the need is to ensure the rights of those people and all those issues related to their identity and existence whose entire life is completely dependent on forests. Which has been continuously exploited since the British period under the concept of “metropolitan city” for the creation and development of a better civilization. For example, here I mean those judicial activities and political alliances in the context of tribal issues through which tribals are being given legal protection, but perhaps the judicial system is not that capable of deciding the scope of their rights under the claim of their rights. Then, in order to protect the industrial houses, the state snatches away the rights of the tribals by putting the government stamp of national interest and cooperative development on their lands.

Abstract [Hindi]

भारत में आदिवासियों के सामुदायिक अधिकारों का मुद्दा सामाजिक न्याय व समाज के मूल निवासियों के अस्तित्व व पहचान से जुड़ा हुआ है जिसे आज चर्चा से नजरअंदाज नही किया जा सकता। क्योंकि आज आवश्यकता उन लोगों के अधिकारो और उनकी पहचान और अस्तित्व से जुडे उन तमाम मुद्दों को सुनिश्चित करने की है जिनका सम्पूर्ण जीवन पूरी तरह से सिर्फ वनों पर ही निर्भर है। जिसका दोहन ब्रिटिश काल से ही एक बेहतर सभ्यता के निर्माण और विकास की “मैट्रोपोलिटिन सिटी” की अवधारणा के अन्तर्गत् लगातार किया जाता रहा है। मसलन यहाँ मेरा आश्य आदिवासियों के मुद्दो के संदर्भ में उन न्यायिक गतिविधिायों और राजनितिक गठजोड़ से है जिनके माध्यम से आदिवासियों को कानूनी सरंक्षण तो दिया जा रहा है परन्तु शायद न्यायिक व्यवस्था इनके अधिकारों की दावेदारी के तहत इनके अधिाकारों के दायरो को तय करने में उतनी संक्षम नही है। तभी मौके बेमौके औ़द्योगिक घरानों को सरंक्षण देने के लिये राज्य द्वारा आदिवासियों की जमीनों पर राष्ट्रीय हित और सहकारी विकास का सरकारी ठप्पा लगा कर इन से इनके ही अधिकारों को छीन लिया जाता है।

References

Primary Sources

“Forest Conservation Act 1980”, Ministry of Law and Justice, New Delhi.

The Constitution of India, As Amended By The Constitution (Ninety-eighth Amendment) Act 2012. New Delhi, Universal Law Publishing.

The Provision Of The Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas). Act, 1996, No.40 of 1996.

Secondary Sources

Books

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections On the Origin and Growth of Nationalism London, Verso.

Baviskar, A. (1995a). The Political Use of Sociology for the Depressed in Maharashtra’, in ‘Land Reforms in India: Performance and Challenges in Gujarat and Maharashtra’ (ed.). Shah, G. and Sha, D.C, New Delhi, Sage Publications.

Basu, D. D. (2011). Introduction to the Constitution of India. Nagpur, pp. 191, LexisNexis.

Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring (Special Anniversary Edition). Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

Elwin, V. (1945). ‘Sacra Fituris’ Man in India 25(4), December.

Forest Conservation Act 1980” Ministry of Law and Justice, New Delhi.

Gadgil, M. and R. Guha (1992). This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India, Delhi, Oxford University Press.

Gandhi, I. (1972). Man and his World, Speech at UN Conference of the Human Environment, Stockholm, 14 June 1972,

Gandhi, I. (1983). On Peoples and Problems. Hodder and Stoughton, London, 2nd Edition, 1983.

Govind, C. R. and Dean, D. (2006). Tribal Development In India: The Contemporary Debate’, Sage Publications, New Delhi /kThousand Oaks, London.

Greenough, P. (2003). “Pathogens, Pugmarks and Political ‘Emergency’: The 1970’s South Asian Debate on Nature” in P. Greenough and A.L. Tsing (ed.). Nature and the Global South: Environmental Projects in South and Southeast Asia’, pp. 201-230, Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1198tsr.11

Guha and Martinez, A. (1997). Varieties of Environmentalism, North and South. Delhi. Oxford University Press.

Guha, R (2000). Environmentalism: A Global History, Delhi, Oxford University Press.

Hardiman, D. (1984). Adivasi Assertion in South Gujarat: The Devi Movement of 1922-23’, in Subaltern Studies III, (ed.) Guha, R., Delhi, Oxford University Press.

Heredia, R. C. (1995). “Tribal Education For Development: Need For A Liberative Pedagogy For Social Transformation” Economic and Political Weekly. 22 April, pp. 891-97.

Joshi, V. (1998). Tribal Situation In India: Issues In Development With Special Reference to Western India. Rawat Publication.

Kothari, A. (2005). “Bungle In The Jungle” in Seminar: 552, August.

Kothari, A. (2006). Miss The Trees For The Wood. The Hindustan Times, Delhi, June. 2.

Kothari, R. (1988). State Against Democracy: In Search of Humane Governance Delhi, Ajanta.

Lele, S. and Menon, A. (2014). “Democratizing Forest Governance in India” in S. Khanna, Boundaries of Forest Land: The Godavarman Case and Beyond, New Delhi, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198099123.001.0001

Mahapatra, A. K. (1968). Social Movements Among Tribal in Eastern India. Sociologies, 18(1).

Mahapatra, L. K. (1994). Tribal Development In India: Myth and Reality New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House.

McNeill, R. (2000). Something New Under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth Century. Penguin, Allen Lane, London.

Munshi, I. (2012). The Adivasi Question: Issues of Land, Forest and Livelihood. New Delhi, Orient Blackswan.

Pathak, A. (1994). Contested Domains: The State, Peasants and Forests In Contemporary India. New Delhi, Sage Publications.

Prasad, A. (2004). Environmentalism and The Left: Contemporary Debates and Future Agendas In Tribal Areas. New Delhi, Left Word.

Shah, G. (2009). Social Movement in India: A Review of Literature. Sage Publication, India. Pvt. Ltd.

Singh, H. (1967). Report of The Committee of India on Tribal Economy In Forest Area. Government of India, New Delhi.

Singh, K. S. (1983a). Tribal Movements in India. vol. II, Delhi, Manohar.

Singh, K. S. (1986). Agrarian Dimensions of Tribal Movements. in Agrarian Struggles in India after Independence. (ed.). Desai, A. R, New Delhi.

Sundar, N. (2009). Legal Grounds: Natural Resources, Identity and the law In Jharkhand. Delhi, Oxford University Press.

The Constitution of India, As Amended By The Constitution (Ninety-eighth Amendment) Act 2012. New Delhi, pp. 204-206, Universal Law Publishing.

Yoram, B. (1989). Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge. pp. 1988, Cambridge University Press.cles

Bailey, M. J. (1992). Approximate Optimality of Aboriginal Property Rights. Journal of Low and Economics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467249

Kolavalli, S. (1995). “Joint Forest Management: Superior Property Rights?” Economic and Political Weekly Vol. 30, No. 30 (Jul. 29), accessed date 01. 10. 2014, 01:03.

Sarin, M. (2001a). Disempowerment in the Name of Participatory Forestry: Village Forest Joint Management in Uttarakhand in India, Forest Trees and People Newsletter. No.44, World Rainforest Movement.Sundar, N. (2005). “Laws, Policies and Practices In Jharkhand” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.40, No.41.

Hindi Sources

कमल नयन चोबे, (2013ए) दो प्रगतिशील कानूनों की दास्तानरू राज्य, जन-आन्दोलन और प्रतिरोध प्रतिमान समय, समाज, संस्कृति, खंण्ड 1(1), 149-177।

कमल नयन चोबे ( 2013) जगल का संघर्ष प्रगातिशील कानून और राज्य सामाजिक प्रकाशन समाज और इतिहास, नवीन श्रंखला 3, नेहरू स्मारक संग्राहलय एंव फस्तकालय, नई दिल्ली।

चोबे कमल नयन (2013). जंगल का संघर्ष, ‘प्रगतिशील’ कानून और राज्य, सामायिक प्रकाशन समाज और इतिहास नवीन श्रृखंला, 3, नेहरू स्मारक संग्राहलय एवं फस्तकालय, नई दिल्ली।

एडवेचंर टूरिज़्म आदिवासियों के अधिकारों का हनन, सलमान रावी, बीबीसी, मंगलवार, 20, मार्च, 2012।

महाश्वेता देवी, (1979). जंगल के दावेदार, राधाकृष्ण प्रकाशन, नई दिल्ली।

योजना, ‘जनजाति एवं वंचित वर्ग’, वर्ष 58, अंक 1, जनवरी 2014, पृष्ठ संख्या 18-19.