THE DEATH PENALTY AND ETHICS

Authors

  • Dr. Minakshi Sharma Assistant Professor of Law, Vaish College of Law, Rohtak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i3.2024.2417

Keywords:

Deterrent Theory, Ethics, Abolitionists, Bias

Abstract [English]

The execution of a person who has been found guilty of a crime by the state is known as the capital penalty. The usefulness of this punishment is hotly contested in today's culture. The moral perspective of abolitionists holds that the death sentence is unethical because it violates human rights and can lead to biased sentencing. The "eye-to-eye approach" and the "deterrent theory" are the main arguments used by proponents of the death penalty to support their position. However, some Indian court rulings have emphasized the "rarest of the rare" situations for which this type of punishment ought to be applied.

References

Aggarwal H. O. 2011, A Book On Human Rights [Ed XII] Central Law Publication

N. Prabha Unnithan. Crime and justice in India. Published by sage publications. 2013.

Gopal Gandhi. Abolishing the Death Penalty: why India say no to capital punishment. Published by Indira international centre.2016.

N. Prabha Unnithan. Crime and justice in India. Published by sage publications.2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132114109

P.K.Supreme Court on rarest of rare cases. Universal law publishing.2011.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/capitalpunishment

Bacchan singh v/s State of Punjab AIR 1980 SC 653.

http://www.indiankanoon.org.

news.rediff.com

https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/flashbks/death/dpenshaw.htm, June 1948

https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/127654/16/10_chapter%203.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31

How to Cite

Sharma, M. (2024). THE DEATH PENALTY AND ETHICS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(3), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i3.2024.2417