Management of Printing Curriculum in AI Era

 

Anchal Gupta ¹, Ujwalla Gawande ², Rohit Chandwaskar ³, Nuzhat Ahmad Yatoo ⁴, Richa Srivastava ⁵,

Pooja Abhijeet Alone ⁶

 

¹ Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140417, Punjab, India

² Professor and Dean R and D, Department of Information Technology, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

³ Assistant Professor, Department of Fashion Design, Parul Institute of Design, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

⁴ Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), Tamil Nadu, India

⁵ Associate Professor, School of Business Management, Noida International University, India

⁶ Department of Engineering, Science and Humanities, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, 411037, India

 

1. Introduction

The printing business that used to be based on the artisan and mechanical focus and accuracy is currently experiencing a paradigm shift with the introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI), automation, and data-driven processes. With the world entering Industry 5.0, printing is not limited to operations of conventional presses anymore but it has become a smart, connected ecosystem that incorporates digital creation, smart production, and responsive workflow operations. This change requires a subsequent adjustment in the education systems especially in handling printing courses to equip students with the requirements of the AI-enhanced work environment Southworth et al. (2023). Both technical and creative skills needed by graduates in the field are being redefined by the development of machine learning, robotics and predictive analytics into printing processes. Traditionally, printing education focused on manual skills (calibration by color, composition of layout, maintenance of a press, etc) Soliman et al. (2024). Although these competencies are still pertinent, the contemporary printing world demands other skills in algorithmic intelligence, data visualization, process optimization, and sustainable utilization of materials.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Conceptual Framework for AI-Integrated Printing Curriculum Management

 

From the advent of intelligent prepress systems, self-checking quality and computer vision to inspect defects are only some of the examples of how AI is changing the working process. This has forced schools and colleges to reform their one to include both traditional education as well as computational intelligence as shown in figure 1 and consequently, schools must also design a curriculum that will not just impart craft knowledge to students but they must also impart technological literacy and innovation oriented attitudes Wang (2022). The printing curriculum management during the AI age would not simply be reduced to the introduction of new courses. It consists of methodical restructuring which comprises pedagogical orientation, staffing, modernization of infrastructure and continuous industry partnership. As the high paced technological changes continue to change, institutions ought to adopt flexible and outcome based structures that easily conform to the changes. Curriculum management with AI also enables making decisions by data, which will enhance the educators to monitor the advances of learners, determine the skill deficiencies, and deliver individual learning experiences using smart learning systems. Moreover, the adoption of academic-industry partnerships is also used to ensure that education programs are not out of touch with practice and emerging skills that are required in the real world Tlili et al.  (2023)

In its turn, the current research paper is aimed at studying how the principles of AI integration may be applied in a systematic fashion in order to modernize and manage the printing curriculum in an efficient way. The gap in the traditional and AI-enabled production environment will be addressed in the paper through discussion of the history of printing technologies, methods of teaching, and use of practical examples to develop a holistic framework that could enhance the comprehension and allow bridging the gap between the traditional and modern printing environment. The ultimate target of the research is to achieve a creative and future-oriented learning environment whose role balance is between creativity, technology, and sustainability in the printing sector.

 

2. Historical Evolution of Printing Education

The history of printing education resonates with overall technological and cultural changes that have influenced the communication and manufacturing sectors. In early days of its development, printing was rather a manual art based on the art of typesetting, lithography, bookbinding, and operation of the press. Precision, discipline and material knowledge were the main features of apprenticeship models Solimanb et al. (2025). Late 19th and early 20th century educational institutions incorporated new workshop-based pedagogies in which learners were taught by repetition and by solving mechanical problems. The curriculum was based on process efficiency, color accuracy and quality control skills that were important in the early development of the industrial printing industry Zawacki-Richter et al.  (2019). But, as the digital revolution in the late 20th century, the range of printing education started to enlarge to cover not physical processes but digital prepress and computer-aided design and workflow automation.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Evolutionary Trajectory of Printing Education

 

In the 1980s, with the advent of desktop publishing (DTP), and in the 1990s, with the advent of digital imaging technologies, the idea of curriculum began to change. The computer-to-plate and computer-to-print systems were becoming increasingly popular to replace traditional presses thus making it mandatory that institutions learn to incorporate digital literacy and software proficiency into their curriculum as shown in Figure 2 .The area of pedagogical orientation changed to the innovative design thinking and digital management Scuotto et al.  (2017),De Bernardi et al.  (2019). Higher education institutions started to introduce classes on digital color theory, learning on the art of vector graphics, typography automation and print media design. This shift also resulted in an interdisciplinary overlap of communication design, information technology, and print engineering which formed the basis of the hybrid educational ecosystem that is experienced today. With the advent of Industry 4.0, which is the smart manufacturing, robotics, and Internet of Things (IoT) in the 21st century, automation and scale data analytics were implemented in the printing sector. Printers turned into smart systems that could self-calibrate and predictively maintain themselves along with cloud-based workflow synchronization Altun et al.  (2025),Habib et al. (2025). However, the curricula tended to be behind this industrialization and most curriculums had traditional modules on print mechanics and not data-driven operations. Realizing this void, some of the first institutions started to offer courses in AI application in imaging, machine-learner print defect detection and print design with the help of augmented reality Hamzat et al.  (2025)

 

3. AI Transformation in Printing Technologies

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in printing technologies has changed the manner in which it is applied in the production process, design process and quality control. The traditional printing was usually done manually on calibration and matching of the colors manually and inspecting manually to identify defects. The convergence of machine learning and computer vision with intelligent automation has however transformed these operations to data-driven agile ecosystems. AI-based printing systems can now learn by its own with input data on production, streamline processes in real time and predict system problems before they occur, bringing in a new age of accuracy, speed and sustainability. The most important aspect of this revolution is a smart prepress automation, according to which using a computer program, digital artwork is measured to maximize colors, layout positioning or ink position Subeshan, B., Atayo, A., and Asmatulu, E. (2024), Altun (2025). These systems employ predictive analytics that modify settings in real-time and ensure that they reduce waste and do not need to print a test repeatedly. Similarly, computer vision and deep learning models can also be used to carry out quality assurance. High-resolution images of printed materials are captured and analyzed by cameras fitted in the printing units and the microscopic defects of the printed materials, including variation in color, streaking, or misalignment, are detected. The system will automatically recalibrate or shutdown production, which maintains the same quality with a minimum of human interventions as shown in Figure 3. Another important development is AI-based workflow management that combines the process of job scheduling, machine use, and material logistics into a single digital system. The reinforcement learning algorithms consider various variables that include print volume, type of paper, drying time and the workload of the operator to create the best production sequences Altun (2025). This has increased the efficiency in the operations and also reduced downtimes between commercial printing systems. Moreover, AI is changing predictive maintenance whereby sensors can be used to detect the vibration, temperature, and the flow of ink and even tell when a potential breakdown will occur before it disrupts production. The above predictive models are directly associated with cost saving and sustainability in terms of extending the life of the machines and minimizing resource wastage Al’Aref (2018).

Figure 3

Figure 3 AI Transformation Map in Printing Processes

 

The use of generative AI models has brought about new opportunities in the sphere of print design and visualization in the artistic world. The tools, which are grounded on diffusion models, GANs, and transformer-based architecture, enable the designers to create complex and personalized compositions using natural language prompts. Individualized packaging or marketing content that is created by the use of variable data printing systems using AI can serve an example. On the same note, AI application combined with augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) would allow displaying a design in three-dimensional forms before printing it on paper, increasing efficiency and interaction with clients Al’Aref (2018). All these inventions have reinvented the skill pool in the printing industry. The contemporary printing specialist is not just a specialist in materials and equipment, he/she should be a fluent reader of analytics dashboard, a user of trains artificial intelligence, an ethical operator of automatic tools. In turn, the use of AI in the printing technologies will serve as the foundation of the re-imagination of the curriculum design that will force teachers to consider the concept of computational literacy, data interpretation, and sustainability as the part of the printing education systems in the future.

 

4. Curriculum Design for AI-Integrated Printing Education

The AI era in the field of printing presupposes the development of an effective curriculum that can be designed only through a comprehensive reorganization of learning outcomes, learning content and evaluation systems. This transformation entails the integration of AI principles into the main printing topics, the introduction of new interdisciplinary courses, and the matching of the outcomes with the requirements of the industry and accreditation systems. The principle of AI-based curriculum design is to use competency mapping determining the technical, cognitive, and ethical skills needed in future printing careers Thomas (2022). Cognitive competencies revolve around thinking critically, solving problems in an adaptive manner, and making innovation design-driven, whereas ethical competencies surround responsible practices with AI, knowledge of intellectual property, and environmental awareness Boretti (2024). These competencies mapped are to be used in the sequencing of subjects, project-based learning modules, and evaluation rubrics in order to balance theory and application.

Figure 4

Figure 4 Framework for AI-Integrated Printing Curriculum Design

 

To realize these competencies, the curriculum designers can use a three-level model. The Foundational Modules level is the introductory level that teaches learners about the basics of digital printing, the basics of computer vision and machine learning in imaging Metal (2023). The next layer is the Applied Intelligence Modules, which involve the implementation of AI tools in production planning, workflow optimization, and design automation, which allows students to use algorithms in real-world scenarios as shown on Figure 4. The third is Capstone and Research Projects tier, which is the most innovative and involves interdisciplinary teamwork, during which learners engage in creating prototypes, like an intelligent quality control system or a generative design software to package. This is progressive to ensure that the learning process begins with theoretical knowledge that brings about the practical implementation. Besides, the curriculum must emphasize on the experiential and adaptive learning. With the help of AI-based simulation environments, the models of digital twin, and even virtual print laboratories, students will be able to be exposed to the real-time visualization and simulation of production scenarios. Personalized learning analytics based on AI have the ability to track the performance patterns, provide adaptive feedback, and recommend learning resources that are guided by the strengths and weaknesses of a particular student. Such systems can transform the teaching approaches into a dynamic feedback system, which enhances the degree of engagement and retention. There is also the necessity to collaborate with the industry and research centers, which is institutional. Co-designed modules, joint certifications, and AI-oriented internships will aid in ensuring that the curricular relevance is achieved and that employability is created. The accreditation agencies will also be combined, which will guarantee both compliance with the education standards, and the flexibility of innovation. Lastly, the curriculum must be not only infused with the technical competencies but also with the mentality of innovation which enables the graduates to lead the revolution in the printing industry by being innovative, ethical and technologically proficient.

 

5. Pedagogical Strategies and Learning Models

The implementation of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the sphere of the printing education presupposes the paradigm shift of the teaching process: it is not the teacher-oriented, but the learner-oriented, information-driven and adaptive approaches. Pedagogical strategies will be forced to transform to incorporate experiential learning, critical thinking, interdisciplinary learning in such a way that students are prepared to work in a rapidly evolving print ecosystem that is a blend of automation, creativity and sustainability. The key secret to successful management of the printing curriculum in the AI age is thus to not only redesign the content, but also reinvent the learning process itself. One of the main approaches is the project-based and experiential learning, according to which students can use AI technologies in real-life printing situations. Using real world projects like creating smart quality inspection systems or predictive maintenance dashboards the learners interact with the industry grade tools as they work on their practical issues. These experiences enhance the conceptual knowledge and facilitate self-directed learning. These projects may also be used as personalized learning datasets, when they are filled with AI analytics where an educator can assess competency development and detect skill deficiencies over time. Similarly relevant is the existence of learning environment through simulation as shown in Figure 5. These systems embrace trial and error and feedback which are similar to the actual industrial setting. As an example, a student will be able to visualize the influence of machine learning parameters on the ink flow, print density, or defect frequency in real-time and develop a better understanding based on the experiential reinforcement.

Figure 5

Figure 5 AI-Enabled Pedagogical Ecosystem for Printing Education

 

Another important dimension provided by blended learning models is the integration of face-to-face learning and online learning modules which are supported by AI. Adaptive platforms have the ability to process the data about each learner, e.g. engagement time or quiz scores or error rates, and dynamically change the complexity of the content. This form of continuous feedback guarantees differentiation instruction that is consistent with the advancement and cognition type of each learner. In addition, AI-based tutoring systems can be used to complement faculty support by providing immediate clarifications, computerized simulations, or contextual materials depending on their interactions with learners. Through interdisciplinary teamwork, co-creation between designers and engineers, and virtual tools of collaboration, students are able to acquire the valuable soft skills in addition to the technical skills. The AI tools can also improve collaboration even further, by monitoring the group dynamics, making sure that everyone is equally active, and offering analytics on the balance of communication efficiency or creative output. Lastly, there should be an ethical and reflective pedagogy that should go hand in hand with these innovations. Since AI technologies are becoming the part of creative decision-making, educators need to develop awareness regarding the transparency of algorithms, intellectual property, and cultural representation. Integrating reflective debates and design ethics workshops is a guarantee that the technological literacy would be developed concurrently with the ethical sensitivity.

 

6. Faculty Development and Institutional Readiness

The integration of AI in the field of printing education is largely reliant on the readiness of the members of the faculty and on the institutional ecosystem, which underpins them. Although technological innovation is transforming the learning environment, human skill is the main ingredient of successful curriculum implementation. Thus, it is vital to prepare teachers with the essential digital, analytical, and pedagogical skills so that the shift to AI-driven education does not mentioned in vain and can be maintained. Development of faculty in this regard is not restricted to technical training but it is a complete change in instructional roles. To integrate AI tools and be more creative and engaging in the learning process, teachers will need to change into more than mere providers of information, data interpreters, and co-learners. There are three broad areas to which structured professional development programs should be targeted:

1)     AI and information literacy, which allows teachers to learn and apply the concepts of machine learning to real-life print situations;

2)     Innovation in pedagogy, in which they will create interactive and AI-assisted teaching programs;

3)     Ethical and socio-technical awareness to equip them to deal with bias, authorship, and automation anxiety in the classroom.

In addition, a culture of ongoing improvement and joint experimentation may be cultivated in peer learning communities and interdepartmental hubs of innovation on a university campus.

Figure 6

Figure 6 Institutional Readiness Model for AI-Integrated Printing Education

 

On an institutional level, preparedness implies the strategic alignment of policy, leadership vision and infrastructure. Smart laboratories that have intelligent printing solutions, cloud-based analytics software, and digital simulations should be invested in institutions. Those facilities will be used as living laboratories where both students and faculty may learn about applied AI methods in design, workflow automation and quality optimization. At the same time, the administrative schemes should be re-organized to accommodate the data-driven decision-making processes as shown in figure 6, dynamic curriculum revision, and teacher performance analytics. The institutional policies need to promote innovation where the contributions made by faculty in teaching research based on AI and the participation in technology based pedagogical research should be rewarded. Industry collaboration is also another important issue of institutional readiness. Co-designing curriculum, sharing of resources, and internships in real-world industrial environments can be made possible by alliances with printing technology companies, scientists of AI solutions, and professional associations. These interactions are beneficial as they keep educators abreast of the new AI tools, predictive models and sustainability models that are currently being implemented in practice.

 

7. Case Studies of AI Implementation in Printing Programs

The introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the field of printing has already started to change the academic programs of universities and training wards all over the world. Such applications will be informative in terms of how AI-based technologies and pedagogical innovations may transform the process of curriculum delivery, improve results, and keep education abreast with the changes in the industry. The case studies below can demonstrate how AI-enabled printing programs can be applied practically, proving various approaches in an academic and industrial setting.

Case Study 1: Smart Printing Laboratory Initiative – Finland Polytechnic Institute

Finland Polytechnic Institute, in the Department of Media Technology, introduced a Smart Printing Laboratory which has AI-enabled digital presses, computer vision modules, and predictive analytics systems. The project was meant to educate students on intelligent production processes and management of materials sustainably. The AI models were applied by the students to study print quality, optimize the use of ink, and predict the need of maintenance.

Table 1

Table 1 Smart Printing Laboratory Initiative – Finland Polytechnic Institute
Parameter	AI Tool / Technique Used	Observed Improvement (%)	Learning Outcome	Remarks
Print Quality Optimization	Computer Vision + CNN-based Defect Detection	30	Students achieved higher accuracy in color calibration and print alignment	Demonstrated real-time quality analytics
Material Efficiency	Predictive Analytics for Ink and Paper Usage	25	Enhanced understanding of sustainable printing processes	Reduced waste across lab projects
Workflow Automation	Reinforcement Learning Scheduler	40	Students learned process sequencing and job optimization	Improved production turnaround
Machine Health Prediction	Sensor Data + Regression Models	20	Exposure to predictive maintenance concepts	Increased equipment uptime and reliability
Faculty Training Impact	AI Literacy Workshops		Faculty gained technical and pedagogical AI competence	Supported integration across courses

 

The program also cited a decline in material waste by a factor of 25, as well as the workflow efficiency that had improved by 40 percent. Educators who had undergone ongoing AI upskilling trainings incorporated these tools in their education practices and this created a balance between technical skills and environmental awareness.

Case Study 2: AI-Driven Curriculum Redesign – Indian Institute of Printing Technology

Indian Institute of printing technology (IIPT) adopted an AI based curriculum management system in order to customize learning journeys. The platform tracked progress of students, and suggested adaptive learning modules, using machine learning analytics, and based on performance data.

Table 2

Table 2 AI-Driven Curriculum Redesign – Indian Institute of Printing Technology (IIPT)
Curriculum Component	AI System Functionality	Measured Impact	Quantitative Indicator	Outcome Description
Adaptive Learning Platform	Machine Learning–Based Performance Prediction	Enhanced student engagement	+35% engagement rate	Personalized content and pacing for each learner
Assessment Analytics	NLP-Based Essay Evaluation	Improved grading accuracy	+22% scoring consistency	Automated rubric alignment and reduced evaluation bias
Skill Gap Monitoring	Bayesian Knowledge Tracing	Early identification of weak learners	-18% failure rate	Allowed proactive remedial sessions
Industrial Collaboration	Real-Time Data Integration APIs	Strengthened academia–industry interface	+3 new partnerships	Improved relevance of practical modules
Faculty Decision Support	AI Dashboards for Class Analytics	Improved curriculum agility	Updated every semester	Data-driven course redesign cycles

The system was also used to predict student successes in particular technical fields whereby instructors could intervene. The institute found higher participation rates among the students (by 35 percent) and better completion rates (by 20 percent) in advanced courses of digital printing in two academic cycles. In addition, partnership with local printing companies offered students with access to real time industrial information which enhanced academia-industry relationships.

Case Study 3: Generative Design and Print Innovation – Tokyo University of Art & Technology

The application of generative AI models including diffusion-based visual synthesis tools to print design education was first made by Tokyo University School of Design. Students experimented with innovative automation, creating complicated textures, patterns and layouts of packaging and digital art prints.

Table 3

Table 3 Generative Design and Print Innovation – Tokyo University of Art & Technology
Creative Domain	AI Technique Applied	Evaluation Metric	Student / Faculty Feedback	Innovation Outcome
Print Design	Diffusion Models for Pattern Generation	Creative Diversity Index = 0.87	84% of students reported increased design exploration	Introduced cross-disciplinary AI art module
Typography	Transformer-Based Style Adaptation	Consistency Score = 0.91	78% of faculty noted precision improvement	Enhanced design coherence in print layout
Packaging	GAN-Based Visual Enhancement	Visual Appeal Rating = 8.6 / 10	81% of students preferred AI-assisted design	Enabled real-time prototyping
Cultural Integration	AI Semantic Embedding for Aesthetics	Cultural Authenticity Score = 0.82	Strong acceptance from art departments	Bridged cultural heritage with computational creativity
Learning Experience	Interactive AI Feedback Interface	Engagement Uplift = +28%	Faculty noted improved interdisciplinary dialogue	Reinforced innovation-oriented pedagogy

 

The course combined computational creativity and cultural aesthetics, whereby the ownership of AI-generated art has an ethical basis. According to the surveys, 82 percent of students said they felt more confident in their creativity, and the faculty said there was better collaboration between design and engineering departments, which were now cross-disciplinary.

All these case studies point to one conclusion that the adoption of AI in the printing programs does not only result in more effective technical operations, but also in the re-invention of creativity, pedagogy, and collaboration. The major lessons learned are that institutional readiness is important, faculty flexibility is important, and unremitting collaboration with industry ecosystems as shown in Figure 7. The results show that an AI-driven curriculum produces innovation-driven professionals who have both analytical and creative intelligence that can enable them to succeed as leaders in the changing printing industry. Figure 7 is a comparative radar analysis of the outcomes in implementing AI in three institutions. The Finland Polytechnic Institute has a high efficiency and sustainability level which can be explained by the fact that it manages to streamline its working processes and minimize waste of materials by using AI-based processes.

 

 

 

Figure 7

Figure 7 Comparative Overview of AI Implementation Case Studies

 

8. Discussion

This study reveals that the printing curriculum management in the AI age needs paradigm shift in the contents and delivery. Embracing Artificial Intelligence in the entire printing operations that have started with automating prepress, up to generative design have changed the skills and competency required in the current printing workforce. The findings of the case studies demonstrated that AI-driven pedagogical practices can be implemented in the institutions that will experience the apparent benefits in terms of efficiency, engagement and innovation, which explains the need to systematic redesign of the curriculum. The relationship between technological integration and pedagogical innovation is one of the patterns that are also similar in all the implementations and is a symbiotic relationship. The AI-powered personalization tools help to enhance the learning process, and the data analytics enable educators to be able to track the progress and dynamically adjust the content. The results suggest the importance of capacity building of faculty and institutional capacity to uphold such reform. Particularly, the success of the Finnish Polytechnic and IIPT also show that successful curricula need the well-developed faculty and strong digital communities, yet Tokyo University is also concerned with the new uses of AI, and it is an indicator of the even greater divide between the technology and design education. The other notable implication is the strengthening of industry-academia cooperation as a main factor of relevance of the curriculum. Collaborations with AI solution vendors and printing companies will mean that the students will receive a practical learning experience on how things work in the real-life scenario, closing the gap between the educational experience and the industry. Nevertheless, it still has difficulties especially in the ethical fronts regarding the biasing of data, the fear of automation and intellectual property in AI-created print materials. In general, the discussion highlights that the management of an AI-infused printing curriculum needs to be balanced as the person needs to improve technical expertise in it, creative expression, and moral consciousness. The introduction of adaptive and data-driven, interdisciplinary models within institutions will place those institutions in the best position to produce a new generation of professionals who will spearhead the smart revolution of the printing industry across the globe.

 

9. Conclusion

The reconfiguration of printing education in the sphere of AI age will be the significant turn to the paradigm of off-the-shelf craftsmanship to the framework of smart-based, information-driven, and multipolar learning. The existing curriculum management is based on how well the AI technologies are implemented in design, production, and pedagogical systems to present the automated, adaptive, and creative environment to the industry to the students. The case findings and analysis of the study indicate that the AI-enabled tools adoption in the institutions can make visible considerable efficiency, engagement, and innovation yield, which can reveal the real-life advantages of the digital transformation in the education sector. The long-term success though is to be attained through the faculty readiness of holistic preparedness, the robust infrastructure and the current practice of partnership with the industrial partners. The use of the generative and predictive AI systems also requires the use of ethics and cultural sensitivity. With the education of printing being advanced, the universities ought to have a balance between the use of technology and the human creativity and responsibility. What lies ahead of the printing curriculum is the best ability to create adaptive, ethically focused as well as futuristic professionals who will be in a position to project the industry to a viable as well as intelligent future.

 

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

None. 

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

None.

 

REFERENCES

Altun, F. (2025). Mechanical and Surface Properties of 3D-Printed Ti6Al4V Alloy Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting under Extreme Conditions (Master’s thesis, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, USA).

Altun, F., Altuntas, G., Asmatulu, E., and Asmatulu, R. (2025). Additive Manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V: Influence of Cryogenic and Stress-Relief Heat Treatments on Electrical Conductivity. In Proceedings of the 7th International Trakya Scientific Research Congress, 219–226.

Altun, F., Bayar, A., Hamzat, A. K., Asmatulu, R., Ali, Z., and Asmatulu, E. (2025). AI-Driven Innovations in 3D Printing: Optimization, Automation, and Intelligent Control. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 9(10), 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9100329

Al’Aref, S. J. (2018). 3D Printing Applications in Cardiovascular Medicine. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-01941-6

Boretti, A. (2024). A Techno-Economic Perspective on 3D Printing for Aerospace Propulsion. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 109, 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.01.063

De Bernardi, P., Bertello, A., and Shams, S. M. (2019). Logics Hindering Digital Transformation in Cultural Heritage Strategic Management: An Exploratory Case Study. Tourism Analysis, 24, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354219X15511864843867

Habib, M. A., Subeshan, B., Kalyanakumar, C., Asmatulu, R., Rahman, M. M., and Asmatulu, E. (2025). Current Practices in Recycling and Reusing of Aircraft Materials and Equipment. Materials Circular Economy, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42824-025-00112-6

Hamzat, A. K., Murad, M. S., Adediran, I. A., Asmatulu, E., and Asmatulu, R. (2025). Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Aerospace, Energy, and Marine Applications: An Insight into Failure Mechanisms under Chemical, Thermal, Oxidative, and Mechanical Load Conditions. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials, 8, 152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-025-00652-9

Metal AM. (2023). The Convergence of Additive Manufacturing and Artificial Intelligence: Envisioning a Future That Is Closer Than You Think. Metal AM.

Scuotto, V., Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., and Del Giudice, M. (2017). Shifting Intra- and Inter-Organizational Innovation Processes towards Digital Business: An Empirical Analysis of SMEs. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12221

Soliman, M., Ali, R. A., Khalid, J., Mahmud, I., and Ali, W. B. (2024). Modelling Continuous Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence as an Educational Tool among University Students: Findings from PLS-SEM and ANN. Journal of Computer Education, 12, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00278-3

Soliman, M., Ali, R. A., and Noipom, T. (2025). Unlocking AI-Powered Tools Adoption among University Students: A Fuzzy-Set Approach. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 24, 1–28.

Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., and Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a Model for AI across the Curriculum: Transforming the Higher Education Landscape via Innovation in AI Literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127

Subeshan, B., Atayo, A., and Asmatulu, E. (2024). Machine Learning Applications for Electrospun Nanofibers: A Review. Materials Science, 59, 14095–14140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09432-1

Thomas, D. J. (2022). Advanced Active-Gas 3D Printing of 436 Stainless Steel for Future Rocket Engine Structure Manufacture. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 74, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.032

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., and Agyemang, B. (2023). What If the Devil Is My Guardian Angel: ChatGPT as a Case Study of Using Chatbots in Education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Wang, N. (2022). Application of Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality Technology in the Construction of University Physical Education. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electronic Communication and Artificial Intelligence (IWECAI) (pp. 343–346). https://doi.org/10.1109/IWECAI55315.2022.00075

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., and Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education: Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0