1. INTRODUCTION
The combination of art and technology is not something new
to human progress, and due to the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence
(AI), new paradigms that extend far beyond automation or digital aids have
appeared. The concern of efficiency is not the sole matter in the creative
industry such as art studio management but a most profound restructuring of how
creativity, cognition, and organizational operations interact. The Hyphenated
Intelligence (HI) represents the novel paradigm that entails the joint powers
of human creativity and machine computing so as to create new models of the
artistic production, its management, and collaboration. Rather than labeling AI as the tool to substitute human creativity, HI
is focused on enhancing it to some extent, streamlining the decision-making
process, and taking the boundaries of creativity to the limit. Since the art
studios trace their origins to the traditions of craftwork, experimentation,
and human interaction, it creates challenges and opportunities to be capable of
adapting to the technological change. The increasing complexity of the creative
work, as well as the demands of the globalized market and electronic
distribution, demand the discussion of the new methods of management, which
would put the freedom of artistic activity, along with the precision of
operations, in a disputable position Amabile
(2020). Under these
circumstances, Hybrid Intelligence is an extremely significant concept of
redefining how studios might integrate AI tools, e.g. generative design
systems, predictive analytics and intelligent project management systems
without undermining the human value that generate creative value. HI offers a
gateway to a more flexible, data-driven and creatively empowered studio through
supporting symbiotic relations between humans and curators and intelligent
systems Krinkin et al. (2023). The Hybrid
Intelligence application in management of art studios is complicated. Figure 1 shows the synergy of
human creativity and AI in managing art. On the one hand, it refers to the
cognitive dimension which is, enhancing the ability of the artist to generate,
develop and select creative thoughts by use of intelligent feedback mechanisms.
Figure 1 Conceptual Framework for Hybrid Intelligence–Driven
Art Management
These two points indicate how the studio manager has
become changed such that he now must balance between the notions of human
compassion, aesthetic taste and technological fluency Kim et al. (2019). The final product is
not that human leadership is no longer needed but that it has developed into a
hybrid kind of intelligence that uses intuition alongside the accuracy of an
algorithm.
2. Literature
Review
1) Human
creativity and management practices in art studios
Creativity and innovativeness by human beings has always been central to the art practice and its
organization in art studios presents a special challenge, unlike other
organizational paradigms. The art studio is a place where innovation,
experimentation and expression of emotions meet so management strategies in
these studios should be designed to foster creativity and not to restrain it.
Traditionally, informal leadership, mentorship, and collaborative learning have
been the major components of management in art settings Burger
et al. (2023). The masterapprentice model expanded to more open team-based
organizations in which artists, curators and producers are jointly held
accountable as to creativity. Amabile and Csikszentmihalyi among other scholars
have stressed that creativity thrives in conditions that are neither too rigid
nor too free to allow not only exploration but also goal orientation. Good
management within art studios, thus, is the ability to enable the creativity
flow, whereby the goal of art has to be aligned to the production and market
realities Dellermann et al. (2019). Emotional
intelligence, interpersonal communication and adaptive leadership are all the
qualities that have become imperative in management. But as the creative
industry has become more professionalized, the management of art studios
currently needs to combine logistical accuracy with artistic instinct Panke
(2019). The digital tools of
project tracking, client interaction and visualization of design have started
reducing the position of a manager to the role of a mediator between the
creative vision and organizational performance.
2) Artificial
intelligence applications in creative industries
The creative industries have been eager to adopt
Artificial Intelligence (AI), as the technology is swiftly changing how artists
think and create, and distribute their art. In the field of visual arts, AI
models, including Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), deep learning and
neural style transfer algorithms are being applied to generate original
artworks, automate repetitive design methods, and pursue novel aesthetic
directions Correia
et al. (2023). In addition to the
creation of art, AI is used in management: It simplifies the planning of
workflow, studies preferences of audiences, predicts the trends in the market.
Scholars such as McCormack et al. and Elgammal have
recorded the increasing ability of AI to be a co-creator with the ability to
produce intricate visual images, music pieces, or narratives that can
complement the imagination of humans. Besides creating content, predictive and
analytical capabilities of AI are changing the process of creative businesses Wellsandt
et al. (2022). The assistants using
natural language processing, image recognition, and recommendation systems are
assisting the managers make data-driven decisions as well as personalizing the
audience experiences.
3) Existing
models of human-AI collaboration
Human-AI Collaboration has come to mean more than merely
human-computer interaction models by focusing on the co-creativity and hybrid
intelligence. The initial models of collaboration regarded AI only as a tool,
as an assistant performing predefined tasks Wu et al. (2023). Nevertheless, the
modern worldview establishes AI as a companion in creativity, as able to learn,
adapt, and be in dynamic exchange with human users. This shift can be discussed
in terms of the theoretical premises of Hybrid Intelligence (HI), which underlines
the ability of humans to be flexible in their cognitive abilities and machines
to be precise in order to provide the results that neither of them would be
able to. Research by Dellermann et al and Jarrahi suggests that effective human-AI partnership
requires learning, trust, and interpretability. Table
1 presents some of the
most important studies, methods, findings as well as technologies under review.
These systems are also based on symbiosis, in which human intuition directs the
conceptual innovation and AI provides calculating efficiency and data-driven
vision.
|
Table 1 Summary
of Literature Review
|
|
Study Focus
|
Methodology
|
Domain / Context
|
Key Findings
|
Technology Used
|
|
Creativity in Context Morlotti et al. (2024)
|
Qualitative analysis
|
Organizational creativity
|
Creativity thrives in supportive environments
|
Psychological modeling
|
|
Flow and Creative Process
|
Conceptual framework
|
Creative psychology
|
Flow enhances artistic productivity
|
Cognitive psychology
|
|
Creative AI Systems
|
Experimental design
|
Computational creativity
|
AI assists rather than replaces human creativity
|
Generative algorithms
|
|
Hybrid Intelligence Framework Ackroyd (2020)
|
Mixed methods
|
Human–machine collaboration
|
Combines human insight with machine precision
|
Machine learning models
|
|
Human-AI Collaboration in Organizations
|
Case study
|
Digital management
|
Collaboration increases decision accuracy
|
Predictive analytics
|
|
AI Art and Computational Aesthetics Bosco et al.
(2021)
|
Empirical study
|
Creative industries
|
GANs generate novel art forms
|
GANs, deep learning
|
|
Artists + Machine Intelligence
|
Collaborative research
|
Tech-art integration
|
Human artists co-create with AI
|
Deep neural networks
|
|
Human-Centered AI Design Janas et al.
(2022)
|
Conceptual
|
Human–computer interaction
|
Ethical AI supports creative autonomy
|
Human-centered AI
|
|
Standard Definition of Creativity
|
Analytical review
|
Art and education
|
Creativity = originality + usefulness
|
Theoretical synthesis
|
|
Computational Creativity Hatwar et al. (2025)
|
Empirical
|
Digital art creation
|
AI enables new creative paradigms
|
Reinforcement learning
|
|
AI Aesthetics and Cultural Analytics
|
Quantitative analysis
|
Digital media art
|
AI reshapes cultural production
|
Data analytics tools
|
|
Hybrid Art Management Systems Gao et al. (2023)
|
Experimental
|
Art studio operations
|
Improved workflow and creative synergy
|
AI project management tools
|
3. Theoretical
Framework
1) Hybrid
Intelligence theory and its principles
Hybrid Intelligence (HI) is the emerging paradigm
(interaction) between human cognition and artificial intelligence (AI) that can
solve problems more effectively in terms of the ability to be creative and make
decisions. Contrary to automation, which is designed to substitute human
activity, HI is about cooperation, the combination of intuitive, emotive, and
ethical thinking of humans with the computing, analytical, and pattern-finding
advantages of AI systems. This theory is based on the assumption that the
intelligence that will be formed out of the integration of humans and AI will
be more efficient than the abilities of either of the two parties operating on
their own. The main concepts of Hybrid Intelligence are complementarity, mutual
learning, adaptivity and joint control. Complementarity is used to guarantee
that human and machine capabilities are used to cover the gaps of the other,
i.e. humans offer a contextual knowledge whereas AI is accurate and vast.
Mutual learning is a concept that involves constant feedback mechanisms in
which human beings and machines learn as they interact. Adaptivity puts more
emphasis on flexibility in the task allocation and enables the dynamic change
in accordance with expertise or situational requirement. Shared control, in its
turn, guarantees equal autonomy, maintaining human control and taking advantage
of machine support. When applied in the art studio management context, these
principles reexamine the way creativity and operational decisions are being
designed.
2) Creativity
and cognitive augmentation models
The nexus of creativity and cognitive enhancement examines
how technology and, specifically, AI is able to add value to human creative
abilities and not to replace them. Creativity is a concept that has been
traditionally defined as the capacity to generate novel and useful ideas that
are original and valued and it is a concept that is influenced by intrinsic
motivation and the environment. The ideas behind cognitive augmentation
theories build upon this idea by proposing that human thinking can be enhanced
through the use of tools, interfaces, and intelligent systems that in turn
allow an individual to think at a higher level, which makes a person more
innovative and problem-solving. Cognition models like Extended Mind Theory
(Clark and Chalmers, 1998) suggest that cognition will be spread outside of the
brain to the external systems like in the notebooks, computers, and AI
algorithms. AI is used to assist in art studios as a cognitive companion,
providing comments, creating design options, or simulating aesthetic results.
These activities assist artists in removing creative stagnation and increase
their imagination. Likewise, Distributed Cognition Theory states that
creativity is a result of the overall interaction between people, tools and
cultural artifacts a notion that is most applicable to the collaborative arts
setting. Moreover, Augmented Creativity Models emphasize the way AI improves
divergent and convergent thinking proposing unusual combinations or maximizing
the processes of selection.
3) Management
theories relevant to art studios
Good management in art studio relies on the combination of
organizational management, creativity management, and innovation management
theories. In comparison with traditional business, the art studio works in
dynamic and emotionally charged circumstances where the framework has to
co-exist with freedom. Classical theories of management including the
principles of management as introduced by Fayol offer the background
information on planning, coordination, and control, but should be transformed
into creative situations where inflexibility may suffocate the process. The
Contingency Theory and Systems Theory developed in the modern world focus on
flexibility and connectivity - two essential aspects of a successful art studio
that is an evolving system of artists, curators, and digital technology.
4. Hybrid
Intelligence in Practice
1) Integration
of AI tools in artistic production
AI does not passively act in terms of automation, but it
is a co-creator that extends the scope of human imagination. Musicians are
using AI-powered systems (e.g., Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), DeepDream, diffusion models, etc.) to create visual images,
evaluate design trends, and experiment with new aesthetic styles. The tools
allow one to create hybrid artworks, merging human emotion with the accuracy of
computations. When applied in the context of art studio management, the AIs are
used to improve the exploration of creativity and efficiency in production. Figure 2 reveals incorporation
of AI solutions to improve the artistic creation. Intelligent systems are
applied in artistic fields, such as optimization of color
palette, transfer of styles, synthesis of texture, real-time generative modeling. These abilities eliminate tedious human work and
create more insight into conceptual design.
Figure 2 Framework for Integrating AI Tools in Art Production
In addition, AI may be useful in the process of curating
exhibitions, the reaction of the audience, and forecast the tendencies of the
market so that managers could align creativity production with cultural shifts.
The concept of cross-disciplinary collaboration is also enhanced by this
integration, as artists, technologists and curators are connected with each
other using common digital platforms. Nevertheless, ethical and aesthetic
control is necessary to make the implementation effective to maintain the authenticity
and integrity of authorship. Therefore, the incorporation of AI tools is not a
substitute of human creativity but a symbiotic expansion of it, giving the
artists the ability to go beyond the traditional boundaries and experiment with
the algorithmic aesthetics, as well as to co-create with the intelligent
systems that learn, adapt and inspire in their collaboration.
2) Decision-making
processes combining human and machine input
In Hybrid Intelligence, decision-making becomes a
cognitive process between machines and human beings. Contrary to the ancient
hierarchical architecture, this model of collaboration combines the strengths
of the two, the human intuition, ethical and emotional awareness, and AI data
analytics, pattern recognition, and predictive models. Collectively, they allow
making more informed and adaptive decisions and contextually sensitive
decisions in the realms of art and management. In art studios, it is common to
have a balance between subjective artistic and objective operational judgments
in decision making. AI systems will be able to compute vast amounts of data,
including audience insights and market predictions, production schedules, and
can provide managers with real-time information that can help them improve
their strategic planning. At the same time, human stakeholders perceive such
outputs aesthetically, culturally, and ethically so that recommendations are
consistent with the creative integrity and studio vision.
3) Workflow
optimization through intelligent systems
The implementation of AI-based workflow management systems
changes these processes by automatic zing routine activities as well as
providing real-time flexibility. Artificial intelligence systems can be used to
break down project schedules, predict the project bottlenecks, and
automatically repurpose tasks when resources are available and the team is
performing well. Management tools based on machine learning and predictive
analytics assist managers in making predictions on deadlines, budgets, and
creative progress. In the case of artists, intelligent assistants will be able
to take over repetitive or administrative tasks, including organizing files,
version management, and documentation, and give more time to conceptual and
experimental work. In addition, smart systems are useful in improving
partnership and interaction between multidisciplinary teams. Hybrid dashboards
and artificial intelligence across clouds offer transparency, which enable a
smooth flow of coordination among artists, curators, and producers based on
international networks. The fact that natural language processing (NLP) has
been adopted also helps in human-machine interactions, making the management of
tasks easier with the help of conversational interfaces.
5. Case
Studies and Empirical Findings
1) Successful
examples of hybrid systems in art studios
In the entire creative community, a number of artistic
studios have embraced the concept of Hybrid Intelligence (HI), a phenomenon
that indicates the potential of change when humans and AI work together. One
such interesting case is Refik Anadol Studio which
combines machine learning algorithms and visualization of large amounts of data
to build immersive art installations. Blending artistic intuition with data
aesthetics developed with the help of AI, the team of Anadol
has reconceptualized the way digital ecologies can be used to arouse emotional
and sensual experience. The same can be said of such a project as Obvious Art
Collective, which features the AI-created portrait of Edmond de Belamy and
teaches how artists can use the generative adversarial networks (GANs) to
create the original masterpieces that challenge the traditional understandings
of authorship. In yet another instance, the Google Artists and Machine
Intelligence (AMI) initiative has encouraged the creation of partnerships
between artists and engineers, which resulted in new works that consider the
concept of algorithmic creativity and machine perception. Personal studios and
design studios have also started incorporating AI-based project management and
generative design tools to make the production process easier, the planning of
an exhibition more efficient, and creative ideation more effective.
2) Analysis
of outcomes on creativity, productivity, and management
The empirical study of art studios that apply Hybrid
Intelligence shows that there is a high degree of creativity, productivity, and
management effectiveness. On the side of creativity, artists indicate that the
AI tools can help improve the generation of ideas, generate novel aesthetic
views and experiment with them through iteration. Generative systems assist
artists in resolving their stagnation in creativity by providing a range of
alternatives that human beings find inspiring to reinterpret.
6. Future
Prospects
1) Emerging
AI technologies for creative management
Generative models may be used to create immersive spaces,
whereas AI-based analytics may predict responses of people, or be used to
create more efficient exhibition layouts. Moreover, creative management will
become dynamic due to adaptive learning algorithms that will constantly improve
suggestions in accordance with the changing trends on art and team behavior. Natural Language Processing (NLP) and
conversational AI-based tools will make communication easier between managers,
who will be able to assign administrative duties to artists via intuitive voice
or text messages. Moreover, AI systems built on blockchain technology are
predicted to transform the functions of authorship tracking, digital provenance
and copyright to ensure transparency in collaborative creative activities.
2) Policy
and training implications
In order to overcome such dilemmas, the international
policy organizations and cultural institutions should work together to come up
with new laws that not only protect artistic freedom but also protect the
integrity of technology. Implications of training are also important. Artists,
curators, and managers should become AI literate, which means that they should
not only have technical skills but also critical knowledge of the algorithmic
ethics, bias, and interpretability. Computational intelligence interdisciplinary
education that integrates art and design will be required to equip creative
professionals to work in hybrid environments. Further, art institutions and
universities need to incorporate data-driven creativity, digital ethics, and
hybrid management practices courses in their curricula.
7. Result and
Discussion
The research participants have found that implementation
of Hybrid Intelligence (HI) in the management of art studio improves
creativity, productivity and decision making. AI programs assist the artists in
generating ideas, automating their workflows, and analysing performances, and
human intuition guarantees that they have ethical and emotional substance.
Practical evidence is shown to result in enhanced cooperation, acceleration of
project completion and more data-driven managerial policies. Nevertheless,
there are still difficulties with the rights to authorship, transparency, and
AI literacy.
|
Table
2 Comparative Performance Metrics Between
Traditional and Hybrid Art Studios
|
|
Parameter
|
Traditional Studio
|
Hybrid Intelligence Studio
|
|
Creativity Index (0–100)
|
72
|
91
|
|
Productivity Efficiency (%)
|
68
|
88
|
|
Resource Utilization
Efficiency (%)
|
70
|
90
|
|
Audience Engagement Score (%)
|
66.8
|
93.1
|
Table 2 shows clearly the
better performance of Hybrid Intelligence (HI) studios as compared to
traditional art studios using various creative and operational parameters.
Creativity Index increases by 72 to 91, which means that AI-supplied settings
lead to an enhanced ideation, experimentation, and aesthetics exploration.
Figure 3 Performance Comparison: Traditional vs. Hybrid
Intelligence Studio
Such improvement is the reason why intelligent systems
make the imagination of artists boil over due to a plethora of design
possibilities and critical thinking. Figure 3 shows the performance
variance of a traditional and hybrid intelligence studio. Productivity
Efficiency is also enhanced with change in 68 to 88 showing that AI-based workingflow applications save time and manual effort to do
unnecessary and time-consuming projects and automate workflows. As Figure 4 illustrates, the
development of the studio is followed by the tendencies in performance
depending on the key parameters of its activities. Similarly, Resource
Utilization Efficiency increases to 90% to 70% implying that there is going to
be greater optimization in the utilization of resources including materials,
time, and labor through predictive analytics,
intelligent scheduling applications.
Figure 4 Performance Across Key Operational Parameters
The biggest change can be regarded in the Audience
Engagement, which increases to 93.1 percent to 66.8 percent which is a means of
the ability of the AI-based analysis of the audience and the adaptive content
strategy to increase the viewer engagement. All these signs confirm the fact
that Hybrid Intelligence results in the significant enhancement of the creative
performance, operational nimbleness, and engagement outcome in the framework of
the contemporary art studio management.
|
Table
3 Impact of Hybrid Intelligence Tools on Key
Management Functions
|
|
Management Function
|
Before HI Integration (%)
|
After HI Integration (%)
|
|
Creative Ideation and
Innovation
|
74
|
93
|
|
Workflow Automation and Coordination
|
62
|
90
|
|
Decision-Making Speed and
Accuracy
|
68
|
91
|
|
Data-Driven Strategic Planning
|
60
|
89
|
|
Team Collaboration and
Communication
|
67
|
88
|
|
Project Cost Efficiency
|
71
|
86
|
Table 3 shows the dynamic
impact of the Hybrid Intelligence (HI) tools to the most central management
activities in the art studios. This is most evident in workflow Automation and
Coordination whereby it had increased by 62 percent and 90 percent as AI can be
used to help automate businesses, automate routine tasks, and enhance business
flow. Figure 5 shows how the hybrid
intelligence has enhanced the core management functions.
Figure 5 Impact of Hybrid Intelligence Integration on Core
Management Functions
Another important change was perhaps the boost in Creative
Ideation and Innovation which went up to 93% following the beginning of 74. In
addition, the Decision-Making Speed and Accuracy raised 68 to 91 %, which
confirms that the data analytics and predictive models can assist managers to
make reasonable and timely decisions.
8. Conclusion
The Hybrid Intelligence (HI) in the management of art
studios is a serious shift in the creative sector since the human thinking and
artificial intelligence collide and form a new level of a complex ecosystem.
The findings of the research result in the conclusion that HI does not merely
increase the opportunities of creativity, it also transforms the models of
operational and managerial processes in arts. The art studio is able to gain
efficiency and innovation that has never been experienced before with the human
intuition, emotional sensitivity, and the aesthetic reasoning, coupled with the
accurate analytical precision of the AI and its capability to process the data.
The findings make reference to the fact that Hybrid Intelligence results into
the creation of the high level of creativity as artists are able to explore the
potential of operating with multidimensional design and develop new ideas that
are not typical ones. Simultaneously, smart systems can streamline the business
operations, resource allocation, and project management, which leads to an
improvement in productivity and organizational agility. Information-based
intelligence assists managers in taking strategic decisions that stimulate the
degree of creativity and business performance. However, the transition to
hybrid ecosystems needs ethical, educative and regulatory adjustment. The
issues of authorship, intellectual property and transparency are to be
addressed with the help of strong guidelines and interdisciplinary research.
Artificial intelligence the structure of art in the future must evolve both the
AI literacy and the emotional intelligence: provide the creative professionals
with the power to collaborate with smart technologies without losing human
values.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
None.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
None.
REFERENCES
Ackroyd, P. (2020). The Structural
Conservation of Paintings on Wooden Panel Supports. In Conservation of easel
paintings (pp. 478–503). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429399916-31
Amabile, T. M. (2020). Creativity, Artificial
Intelligence, and a World of Surprises. Academy of
Management Discoveries, 6(3), 351–354.
Bosco, E., Suiker, A. S. J., and Fleck, N. A. (2021). Moisture-Induced Cracking in a Flexural Bilayer with Application to
Historical Paintings. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 112, Article
102779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102779
Burger, M., Nitsche, A. M., and Arlinghaus, J. (2023). Hybrid Intelligence in Procurement: Disillusionment with AI’s
Superiority? Computers in Industry, 150, Article 103946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103946
Correia, A., Grover, A., Schneider, D., Pimentel, A. P., Chaves, R., de
Almeida, M. A., and Fonseca, B. (2023). Designing
for Hybrid Intelligence: A Taxonomy and Survey of Crowd–Machine Interaction.
Applied Sciences, 13(4), Article 2198. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042198
Dellermann, D., Lipusch, N., Ebel, P., and
Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Design Principles for a
Hybrid Intelligence Decision Support System for Business Model Validation.
Electronic Markets, 29(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0309-2
Dong, L., Zheng, H. C., Li, L. T., and Hao, L. N.
(2022). Human–Machine Hybrid Prediction Market: A
Promising Sales Forecasting Solution for E-Commerce Enterprises. Electronic
Commerce Research and Applications, 56, Article 101216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101216
Gao, Y., Ziegler, P., Heinemann, C., Hartlieb, E., and Eberhard, P.
(2023). Experimental Research on the Vibration
Characteristics of Canvas and Primed Canvas of Paintings. Archive of Mechanical
Engineering, 70, 333–350. https://doi.org/10.24425/ame.2023.146850
Hatwar, L. R., Pohane, R. B., Bhoyar, S., and Padole,
S. P. (2025). Mathematical Modeling on Decay of
Radioactive Material Affects Cancer Treatment. International Journal of
Research Development and Management Review, 14(1), 180–182. https://doi.org/10.65521/ijrdmr.v14i1.501
Janas, A., Mecklenburg, M. F., Fuster-López, L.,
Kozłowski, R., Kékicheff, P., Favier, D., Andersen, C. K., Scharff, M.,
and Bratasz, Ł. (2022). Shrinkage and
Mechanical Properties of Drying Oil Paints. Heritage Science, 10, Article 181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00814-2
Kim, S. G., Yoon, S. M., Yang, M., Choi, J., Akay, H.,
and Burnell, E. (2019). AI for Design: Virtual
Design Assistant. CIRP Annals, 68(1), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.03.024
Krinkin, K., Shichkina, Y., and Ignatyev, A. (2023). Co-Evolutionary Hybrid Intelligence is a Key Concept for the World
Intellectualization. Kybernetes, 52(8), 2907–2923. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2022-0472
Morlotti, M., Forlani, F., Saccani, I., and Sansonetti, A. (2024). Evaluation of Enzyme Agarose Gels for Cleaning Complex Substrates in
Cultural Heritage. Gels, 10(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels10010014
Panke, S. (2019). Design Thinking in
Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. Open Education Studies,
1(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022
Wellsandt, S., Klein, K., Hribernik, K.,
Lewandowski, M., Bousdekis, A., Mentzas, G., and Thoben, K. D. (2022). Hybrid-Augmented Intelligence in Predictive Maintenance with Digital
Intelligent Assistants. Annual Reviews in Control, 53, 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.04.001
Wu, Y., Ma, L. S., Yuan, X. F., and Li, Q. N. (2023). Human–Machine Hybrid Intelligence for the Generation of Car Frontal
forms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 55, Article 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.101906
,
B Reddy 2
, Yasoda Ramesh 4
,
Kiran R. Gavhale 5
, Amit Kumar 6
